So she wants to be careful with that, as some lodgers have taken their “landlords” to court and they actually got something like 30% share not just what they’d paid! She’s too thick to even think about all thisI assume she meant that he’d get back his share based on what he paid but not be entitled to half
It’s cheeky too considering her tenants have been paying off this house and she probably could pay a lot of it off too given how many other properties she owns