I’m sorry but part 1 and part 2 of a true crime video on one case being stretched out over four days is a bit excessive. But whatever brings in the most money I guess
Where is the apartment tour video? I can’t find itin the apartment tour she posted, in some frames she has blurred out the company logo out the window but then in others you can still blatantly see it! wasn’t edited well at all... i noticed it immediately. so many people commented saying they knew exactly where she was from the balcony view! she literally gave the internet an exact shot of where she lives to the point you could find it on google maps...
It’s on her second channelWhere is the apartment tour video? I can’t find it
Thank you!It’s on her second channel
She should be bleeping ashamed of herself. How can she justify this? It's pure clickbait. Sadly a lot of YouTubers jump on the true crime trend for the views and money but at the very least focus on the victim(s) !!!i see she renamed her “the lana clarkson case” video to “music producer turned murderer- phil spector”
anything to make the video seem more eye catching for the purpose of entertainment eh? anything to bring in more views and £. and taking the name away from the victim in the process
Exactly this! I think it really dehumanises the victims for the sake of views and promotes the killer in these cases. I’m not sure whether this is the case in the actual videos herself as I no longer watch her - but it’s awful if she is.Another two parter! It’s so obvious she’s doing it so she can get at least two sponsorships per case. Also it’s really irritating me that she makes the two parts sound completely unrelated:
‘The English eyeball killer’ and ‘the school boy serial killer’
‘The reality tv show murder’ and ‘the body found in a suitcase’
Totally agree that the titles are pure clickbait. Like the one she titled ‘the Chinese takeaway killer’...it seemed really unnecessary
Sadly she has been doing this for a while, I remember one she titled "KILLED FOR KEBAB MEAT?" or similar. Just tacky and disrespectful, not to mention very likely false in that case and it only serves to spread misinformationAnother two parter! It’s so obvious she’s doing it so she can get at least two sponsorships per case. Also it’s really irritating me that she makes the two parts sound completely unrelated:
‘The English eyeball killer’ and ‘the school boy serial killer’
‘The reality tv show murder’ and ‘the body found in a suitcase’
Totally agree that the titles are pure clickbait. Like the one she titled ‘the Chinese takeaway killer’...it seemed really unnecessary
As long as she gets her money she doesn't care.Sadly she has been doing this for a while, I remember one she titled "KILLED FOR KEBAB MEAT?" or similar. Just tacky and disrespectful, not to mention very likely false in that case and it only serves to spread misinformation
i also didn't understand why she was naming two+ parters entirely different names but it makes sense - more clicks, more views, more ad revenue etc. There's absolutely no other reason and quite frankly it's disgusting, how does she live with herself?
I love Christina Randall!! Her prison videos are super interesting, I'll have to give her true crime videos a watch as well!I find her videos quite boring and way too long. I have to click off because I lost interest. Also the way she says 'video' really grinds on me sorry to any northeners.
Equally with Kendall, I just shut off after a while. I like how she donates to the families affected and obviously has a large following which I suppose is helpful for the unsolved ones. I only really watch them for the pets
The one I do like is Christina Randall, I've been watching her for a while and she used to do a lot of videos of being in prison but now she does true crime too, I like her personality so much more and she also gives her opinion on cases whereas I feel Kendall just sits on the fence.
She did this with the Junko Furuta case too. She knows her audience is mainly very young so she should've skipped the details and if these kiddies really wanted to know then a quick Google search (just like what their queen does after all) would bring up all the info anyway. I get that some people have a morbid curiosity for this kind of thing but out of respect for Junko and her family+friends it should've been omitted, but she almost seemed to enjoy telling itAlthough knowing that a lot of very young kids watch her, she might want to moderate some of her content. Not sure Peter Scully - one of the videos I watched and was kind of shocked how she got right into the facts of the grisly torture-rapes of toddlers and creation of extreme child pornography etc without really showing much more than a kind of suppressed glee at the awfulness of it - and that sort of tit is really suitable content for pre-teens. I wonder if someone presenting crime with her attitude really causes more harm than good, turning it into some weird form of entertainment with no thoughtfulness, redeeming or educational worth beyond that. Annoying girl.
Oh god, ffs.She did this with the Junko Furuta case too. She knows her audience is mainly very young so she should've skipped the details and if these kiddies really wanted to know then a quick Google search (just like what their queen does after all) would bring up all the info anyway. I get that some people have a morbid curiosity for this kind of thing but out of respect for Junko and her family+friends it should've been omitted, but she almost seemed to enjoy telling it
i believe this was because phil spector recently passed away, hence his name was trending on twitter and google searches. im assuming changing the title to include his name would make it more likely to pop up on google whenever someone searched up his name or anything about his death. would get her more views and therefore more moneyi see she renamed her “the lana clarkson case” video to “music producer turned murderer- phil spector”
anything to make the video seem more eye catching for the purpose of entertainment eh? anything to bring in more views and £. and taking the name away from the victim in the process