I don't thinks she cares about accountability. The only way she'll stop is when it starts hitting her finances. There's might be a way to come at it from that angle, either through things like Google Reviews of VF... or possibly through FAOs to find out any public contracts and then contacting the lead on that project?She is a disgusting individual. She purposely operates in an unregulated no-man's land where she targets vulnerable people, but has no accountability to anyone. 'A true, humanistic, trauma-informed approach to mental health won’t make money'? But it's making her plenty of money---maybe she would like to share exactly how much? But no, she would delete any comments asking that. The refusal of the BPS to take any action has resulted in her becoming more emboldened. The only hope is that her recent targeting of under 18's, both with her resources but primarily the 'research' she has carried out specifically aimed at 16 and 17 year olds, may highlight some safeguarding issues. This may ultimately be her undoing. There just has to be some regulation of grifters like her, and it may be that while she has got away with targeting vulnerable adults, I would like to think that now she has purposely included under 18's she has set herself up for a higher level of scrutiny. At the end of the day it is her 'chartered' status that appears to be legitimising her. There just has to be some accountability that comes with that, surely??
There's no easy answer. It would take a lot of time and effort.