I don’t know why I do this to myself on a Bank Holiday, he makes my blood boil.
I am in the usual position of “shocked but not surprised” by his response. Where to even start. On the most basic level, it is never a good idea to accuse a disabled person of lying to get a free bathroom. James also seems to persist in the bizarre idea that just because you install something for free, it doesn’t matter if you do a
tit job.
Even if said person wanted part of an old, damaged unit used - as a qualified plumber, surely you would say no if said part was not fit for purpose?
You are trying to tell me that you paid 5.5k for the bathroom to be done. Two things - 1. You are telling me you couldn’t throw in the lino, which is pence in comparison to the rest of it? 2. Given we are talking a house in Burnley, unless the bloke is in a decent sized gaff (which would make me question why said person was getting a free bathroom anyway), that must either be a full referb or a plush bathroom - which begs the question of why everything wasn’t replaced? He must be claiming to use better materials because that is not a basic bathroom cost. Once again with a James “explanation”, I come away with more questions than answers.
MORE questions persists as I wonder why materials are not cheaper given the amount of work James claims to do which would make supplies more cost effective in any other business.
As someone else has pointed out - can you imagine being stood at the Aldi whilst that bellend stands there with two teeth and debit card offering to pay for your hummus? I would assume he had lifted that card straight from some else’s wallet, which he has done in a round about way.
And again, for the absolute brain dead at Depher - it is an incredibly patronising and ableist view to believe that “the disabled and elderly” cannot do or provide things for themselves. To reduce a person to definition by these characteristics is not appropriate.
The entire thing is a clusterfuck of fraud and abuse.