I am not getting my knickers in a twist, I don’t think it is fair to downplay long Covid. It exists and unfortunately young, healthy and fit people are being affected by it with no previous underlying health conditions/poor diets/habits etc.How many. That table is for the 0-2 age group. The point of the post was how crazy it is for people in that age group to get jabbed.
So you tell me, how many in that age group have so called "long covid". Then tell me how many of those can not attribute their long covid to anything else such as existing poor health, pre existing health problems or it simply being psycho samatic. Then tell me how long their loooong covid lasted for.
Because I'm not gonna be jabbing my kids based on limited data and fear mongering over post viral fatigue.
If you don't know that info, I suggest you stop getting your knickers in a twist about "long covid"
The exact number isn’t known as there are on going studies into it.
First findings from world’s largest study on long Covid in children
Up to one in seven (14%) children and young people who caught SARS-CoV-2 may have symptoms linked to the virus 15 weeks later, suggest preliminary findings from the world’s largest study on long Covid in children, led by UCL and Public Health England researchers.
www.ucl.ac.uk
I know! Nor am I looking for an argument. Been a while since fig rolls were mentioned.not looking to argue btw, I do enjoy a friendly debate when we can all converse without getting bitchy.
over a
fig roll or 12