I don't really see why every single policy needs to be picked apart because "what about X". If other financial help is needed for other groups that is a valid but separate conversation.The payment incentive they gave to travellers needing to quarantine didn't work, many people didn't even get the payment, so there's no guarantee they'll get this payment.
How do they police that people will still isolate? They can't and won't, leaving this incentive open to abuse.
For blatant rule breakers they get a £200 FPN, but whilst breaking the rules and possibly catching covid they get £500 towards that fine now.
Over 3 million people haven't had any financial support through this, that money could be helping them!
Most importantly, where the bloody hell is this money coming from?!
Right now one of our biggest problems is people with symptoms not getting tested and not isolating. In order to stop the spread and allow a return to normality that is what needs to be addressed.
Ultimately if everyone who had symptoms properly isolated in the first place we probably never would have needed a third lockdown because the R number would be kept low if people couldn't spread it about a lot.
Read beyond the headline of the article you posted and it will tell you exactly why this is needed.
only 17% of people with symptoms are coming forward for testing, while just one-in-four comply with rules to self-isolate for 10 days after testing positive
If 75% of people are not self isolating you are never going to get a handle on this. Ultimately the biggest factor in the way of people self isolating for the full working 2 weeks is financial, address that and you go a long way towards addressing the problem.
If that stat was reversed and only 1 in 4 didn't self isolate after testing positive as opposed to 3 in 4 then we probably wouldn't need these restrictions for everyone else.