Relatives can still raise concerns though.I’m not sure where it is to quote, but there was chat about the death certificates. I found this article.
Removal of Form 5 Cremation Certificate for deaths relating to Covid-19 under the Coronavirus Act
Did you know that the UK Government have removed Form 5 of the Cremation Certificate for deaths relating to Covid-19 under the Coronavirus Act which is the form that the relative who registers the …thewallwillfall.org
I don't think under 50's are to get it unless they have health problems.Not recommended to have it when breastfeeding either I read - so hope we don’t need a vaccination passport for too much as my child loves the boob...
That’s just all they have been able to scientifically prove, within the timeframe they have. It’s probably longer than 3 months they just can’t back that up yet.Yikes, that's not long
Seems pointless then. People aren't going to get it every 3 months.They think immunity could last for 3 months following vaccination https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19...m-restrictions-likely-to-be-possible-12151178
It's too late to impact on winter pressures. It's going to take a while for any impact to be feltSo all that talk of the vaccine and in reality, it really won't do much.
Well they'd need to vaccinate everyone at the same time or else it would be a continuous cycle would it not ?Seems pointless then. People aren't going to get it every 3 months.
I wonder if they are not testing on children because it is such a huge liability? The RNA vaccine is completely new. Perhaps they feel there is too much risk in case a child gets a bad adversion or dies from it. Also, in general, children are not as affected. I don't think that they don't care, I think the legalities of it would be huge if there was something to go very wrong with testing on kids. It is one thing to test on adults who can give their own consent.. But how do you test on children who can not consent? Their parents could give consent I guess but again, it is risky as the parents will sue if something goes wrong. It isn't so black and white. If they WERE bad, they would not care and just test on kids regardless of potential adverse reactions...it would make them more money if they could vaccinate children too.I have a nephew who is 2 years. He is a high risk case of coronavirus. And he's not.going to.get a vaccine because the fucking goverments and industries have decided not to test vaccines for children or give dosis to them. Why on earth is the life of a 2 year old worth less tha the life of an adult or an 80 year old person? They are hiding data about children. Some of them die. And some of the get an inflamatory response similar to the obe they get from Kawasaki virus. But they dont want to spend money on children. I hope these bastards who dont care about children who are at risk, and even children without preconditions can have an inflamatory response and die from covid, get what they deserve. Sorry, but I am deeply hurt.
so the solution is to let them die if they get it or have them forever isolated at home while they cry for going out with other children? They havr done the same with VRS for 40 years. They dont develop a vaccine because they dont want to spend the money, and every year thousands of children die. But children dont produce money or vote, so they dont care.I wonder if they are not testing on children because it is such a huge liability? The RNA vaccine is completely new. Perhaps they feel there is too much risk in case a child gets a bad adversion or dies from it. Also, in general, children are not as affected. I don't think that they don't care, I think the legalities of it would be huge if there was something to go very wrong with testing on kids. It is one thing to test on adults who can give their own consent.. But how do you test on children who can not consent? Their parents could give consent I guess but again, it is risky as the parents will sue if something goes wrong.
I am sorry about your nephew.
They don't want children to die. Honestly, that is a ridiculous thing to say. You are upset which is understandable but it's got nothing to do with because children don't make money or don't vote.. Many parents were up in arms about the HPV vaccine. You can't blame them for being cautious with this one. They can't win though it seems.so the solution is to let them die if they get it or have them forever isolated at home while they cry for going out with other children? They havr done the same with VRS for 40 years. They dont develop a vaccine because they dont want to spend the money, and every year thousands of children die. But children dont produce money or vote, so they dont care.
But most in care homes can't consent .I think it's an experiment to get the economy moving again they're hoping it helps cut deaths. I hope it does work out as this is the last resort according to the scientists, but the speed they've pushed it through has left many in doubt about taking it .So it's still very much a gamble either way.I wonder if they are not testing on children because it is such a huge liability? The RNA vaccine is completely new. Perhaps they feel there is too much risk in case a child gets a bad adversion or dies from it. Also, in general, children are not as affected. I don't think that they don't care, I think the legalities of it would be huge if there was something to go very wrong with testing on kids. It is one thing to test on adults who can give their own consent.. But how do you test on children who can not consent? Their parents could give consent I guess but again, it is risky as the parents will sue if something goes wrong. It isn't so black and white. If they WERE bad, they would not care and just test on kids regardless of potential adverse reactions...it would make them more money if they could vaccinate children too.
I am sorry about your nephew.
Goverments and pharmaceuticals are all about money. If this vaccine is going so fast is just because they cannot sustain the economy and health system for very long. Not because they care about people. If children were the clue to win they would be developing a vaccine for them. Everything is about money. And I insist: why havent thwy developped a vaccine for VRS? Because it doesnt damage economyThey don't want children to die. Honestly, that is a ridiculous thing to say. You are upset which is understandable but it's got nothing to do with because children don't make money or don't vote.. Many parents were up in arms about the HPV vaccine. You can't blame them for being cautious with this one. They can't win though it seems.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?