Yes I found those after a three-millisecond search so maybe it was intended to be 'drops *by* 16%' not 'drops'*to* 16%', just a typo...?Pfizer is 84% after six months.....
Pfizer's CEO says Covid vaccine effectiveness drops to 84% after six months
Pfizer's vaccine initially protects people 100% of the time against hospitalization, but that falls to low 90% and mid-to-high 80% after 6 months, Bourla said.www.cnbc.com
Moderna after six months is 93%....
...
Coronavirus Disease Outbreak COVID-19 #101
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Coronavirus Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’ve not heard of that app I’ll download it now thank you!xx
I know I suppose that’s my trust for you, I don’t know if they’re so unbothered because I’m only in the first trimester and it’s not supposed to be as serious?x
You said before you were speaking in general terms and now you are saying depends on the way people interpret my posts. Just because I think vaccines work that does no way translate to me pushing this onto other people nor do I see how people can interpret this. I cite things from reputable sources such as scientific studies which = proof.
All my sources are from reputable scientific studies too, which do not equate to proof as real world data is pending
You said I cite things that there is proof of particular things when there isn’t. I have cited studies regarding vaccines efficacy against severe illness and death which I believe show they are working. If you don’t agree with me that is fine but to say that I am pushing my views onto other people is wrong.All my sources are from reputable scientific studies too which do not equate to proof as real world data is pending
There are people with opposing views to me but I do not tell them they are pushing their views on everyone.
(Sorry to others for possibly derailing the thread).
You have said on other threads ' that's proof the vaccines are working ' when I asked for it you had none ? why then do you keep jumping on people with opposing views to yours if they don't bother you .
I have spoken that there is proof of vaccines working (like many other users have done) in reducing severe illness and death and I have linked studies. I am not jumping on people with opposing views to me.
I replied to a comment @Notgonnalie made regarding vaccines not working against transmission by simply saying that they do work to a certain level (something like 60%) from what Prof Hayward was saying. That is hardly jumping on people.
If you’re going to mention me ensure you’re being accurate please. I said what professor pollard did, that vaccines aren’t doing what we need them to be doing and that they won’t reach herd immunity. I never once said they don’t do anything, in fact I said the opposite. I stated they have lessened symptoms and saved lives.
please leave me out of the cattiness.
In your comment regarding what that Prof said you stated (his words) “the vaccine failing to prevent transmission…” and my reply to that was that the vaccines do reduce transmission to a certain extent (something like 60% from what I read). I never once said it was YOUR view and I have never said you say the opposite.
This thread is hard to read at the minute.
More arguments than at any other point...
More arguments than at any other point...
I apologise for derailing the thread massively, I don’t like being accused of doing things when I have not. I will not engage in that conversation further.
The vaccine does fail to totally prevent transmission and the vaccine committees are worried that because of how poor it’s responded to delta that future variants will be even more transmissible with newer variants, I followed that post up with a comment after you questioned this and I agreed with you that it doesn’t fail completely, but that it doesn’t do enough so I’m not sure why you’re tagging me in your arguments we’re not in the playground. There doesn’t need to be a winner we’re all just sharing our opinions doesn’t mean one persons right and one persons wrong.
I already plan to ignore it. Not having another christmas lost!
I expected the summer period to have much lower numbers. Especially with people being able to be outside in good weather more and three quarters of adults fully vaccinated. Autumn could be bad. If you want to go places now is the time before we end up at the risk of things like hospitality shutting again.
Whatever comes our way I think most people now rightfully will be taking their own personal choices and choosing whether to follow guidance (in terms of social mixing in one’s own home). I am another person who won’t be missing out on socialising as a lot of my friends really struggled and when we met again after I could tell the toll it had on them.
Not to mention people who have MH conditions or live alone/not with their partner have every right to see people/each other.
I will not buy into the fear messages the Government will spread about it. And anyone who actually calls the police on someone for seeing their friends and family in their own home needs to take a look in the mirror.
Not to mention people who have MH conditions or live alone/not with their partner have every right to see people/each other.
I will not buy into the fear messages the Government will spread about it. And anyone who actually calls the police on someone for seeing their friends and family in their own home needs to take a look in the mirror.
Welsh data isn’t included today, apparently a fault with the system …I’m sure people are just enjoying their freedom and not even thinking about winter, Old Tom certainly isI expected the summer period to have much lower numbers. Especially with people being able to be outside in good weather more and three quarters of adults fully vaccinated. Autumn could be bad. If you want to go places now is the time before we end up at the risk of things like hospitality shutting again.
How are you feeling today? Hope you are starting to feel better.
It’s great they’re monitoring these things real world data is imperative
Plenty of stock for next years booster campaign
Plenty of stock for next years booster campaign
Last edited:
Must be enough cases if the safety committee are studying it! So scary
From what I've read there isn't a definitive answer for this.
If you read science articles then the jury is still out, words like 'may' and 'might' are used.
The NHS and CDC say you should still get the vaccine, but then they would say that, other scientists say different as is normal in any other medical situation.
With both natural immunity and vaccination the odds of future infection and level of illness are both dependent on age, comorbitities ect
Surely if vaccines were the only way to secure longer immunity, then proof of previous covid infection wouldn't be used on the domestic passports
If a business owner does try playing that card then they need to tread carefully as vaccines aren't mandated and legally they might be open to being sued
- Status