MrsNorthernGrinch
Chatty Member
JanuaryWhen are they due back in court?
JanuaryWhen are they due back in court?
Thought it was postponed by a couple of weeks?The trial was due to start today. Not seen any reporting. I’m guessing they are doing jury selection
Omg thank you for all of this! It’s interesting to know the evidence will all largely be there, I had assumed that we could be waiting years tbh!So soz me babs we have to stay patient for some time longer. But in the meantime did you follow the Murdaugh case? If not then get ok that. That was wild
Yes, I think both are equally culpable in terms of bringing children into the world.It could have been CM that was desperate to carry his children, especially if she was besotted with him, and he just went along with it because they are both not in the right frame of mind. If they've been isolated together for years then I doubt they've been living in reality. Isolation in itself can cause poor mental health. I think they've both caused untold damage
If the taxi driver saw them first week of Jan, I still question why they were not found until the last week of Feb. That's nearly 2 months.It was in the news pretty much daily though, from early January...the first taxi driver recognised them from the news, which would have only been a day or two after the investigation was launched?
Ignore me, no is isn’tCould be wrong but it looks like this double buggy
Yes I watched it. Hard to watch.Hi, been lurking for ages. Just wanted to say before I catch up that has anyone
Seen a programme years ago called “protecting our children” ? It was about social workers and I remember a case of a couple with previous children taken into care, living in tents etc. I think her name was Marva
Agree, evidencing threshold to even get into the court arena is high. Immediate removal on an interim care order higher again.The bar for having children removed is pretty high, so whatever they’d done in the past, it had to be serious.
The weirdest thing is that Constance’s FB had a photo of her standing on a train platform holding a baby (presumably their first child) looking healthy, well groomed, nicely dressed and smiling. She looked completely normal and unremarkable. Something must have gone so badly wrong after this point, for the child to have been removed. I mean: neglect, drugs, mental health issues, chaotic and dangerous lifestyle/living conditions.
Even when removed at birth, which could be a few days, there would be the photos in the hospital. Then once removed, supervised contact is promoted, several times a week until the final hearing. After that, contact reduces to once a month until an adoption match has been found and then stops. So even if they didn’t turn up to any of supervised contact, they’d have the hospital ones.on her fb there’s bty / dav / cof - I wonder if a fourth was removed at birth and that’s why no photos
It would definitely have to be a private psychiatrist but somehow I can't see her as wanting to recognise having an MH issue? If indeed she has one? No money to pay the rent yet money to spend on private psych appointments?I think antenatal care is an entirely different thing to CM’s usual own healthcare, if there’s an assumption that the baby was going to be, or might have been, removed at birth.
As it was reported that they disappeared / began moving around when she was starting to show that she was pregnant, it’s probably fairly safe to assume that she actively avoided any healthcare settings including for herself from that point.
The house could have been like that already, and the timing could have just been a coincidence.
ETA she wouldn’t actually need to be under a GP for a mental illness, you can just see a psychiatrist either NHS or privately and they can issue prescriptions. That would probably be the preferred option for someone with money, as you can pick and choose your appointments and know you’ll definitely see the same person.
With some MH conditions and meds the care needs to be overseen by a psych anyway as a GP can only prescribe to a certain level.
Ok, yes. I can see why they’d want, non-smart, burner phones to call taxis etc.You can only hail down black cabs and if I was on the run that’s the last thing I’d want to do tbh! The demographic of black cab drivers is very different to minicab in east London/suburbia and I’d suspect a black cab driver to be more likely to listen to news/talk radio all day and be active on Twitter thus more likely to have heard of their case, so it would undoubtedly be more risky for them. Obvs they couldn’t use Uber without a linked bank account so they must have called local minicab firms, or some of them allow you to book by an app which is never the best ngl lol.
I understood that’s why she is estranged from her family and friends and it would be 7-8 years ago.Has she been with him a while? I wasn't sure. Yes the child/ren are mixed race.
I do think that the majority will have forgotten all the coverage and now might just recognise their names but not really remember muchMaybe their counsel are thinking it won’t be as fresh in the publics mind and so less bad will towards them![]()