I’m fairly certain those are net gains and losses: so she buys 50 followers, 6 followers unfollow, and the net result is +44.How does she gain so many followers? She hasn't posted since Friday? Do we think she buys them?
I’m fairly certain those are net gains and losses: so she buys 50 followers, 6 followers unfollow, and the net result is +44.How does she gain so many followers? She hasn't posted since Friday? Do we think she buys them?
It kind of doesn’t work tho because if I see anyone gifted anything I blacklist that company! & yes, the list gets bigger everyday but The ones that really get me are ‘influencers’ who have the nerve to accept something then say if (you’re mug enough to) buy, so much % goes to charity. Do those companies honestly think that’s a well thought-out campaignSending gifts to influencers works, that’s why firms do it. They send the gift (a pair of leggings, a tube of moisturiser, a candle) which isn’t a big outlay to them and it gets shown to 10s of thousands of people - that kind of advertising traditionally costs top dollar. It’s the cheapest possible way to advertise and it really yields results - that’s they they keep doing it. And yes, I agree, it’s very bleeping annoying!
No I totally agree Tara and I also have a tit list of companies I’ll no longer buy from but I think the huge amount of people who do buy after seeing these influencers vastly outweighs the few who avoid them. Unfortunately!It kind of doesn’t work tho because if I see anyone gifted anything I blacklist that company! & yes, the list gets bigger everyday but The ones that really get me are ‘influencers’ who have the nerve to accept something then say if (you’re mug enough to) buy, so much % goes to charity. Do those companies honestly think that’s a well thought-out campaign
Oh I get it, yes and for some, like Erica Davies, I absolutely get it as she genuinely carries genuine influence. However, I'm more outraged that the likes of Chloe put minimal effort in, do no research, don't even know how to pronounce a brand's name or test a product before filming herself so she could talk with a little bit of knowledge. It's jus so poor that she wings it and calls on the 'oh I am SO silly/forgetful/exhausted/busy' excuse ' while pouting prettily into the camera.Sending gifts to influencers works, that’s why firms do it. They send the gift (a pair of leggings, a tube of moisturiser, a candle) which isn’t a big outlay to them and it gets shown to 10s of thousands of people - that kind of advertising traditionally costs top dollar. It’s the cheapest possible way to advertise and it really yields results - that’s they they keep doing it. And yes, I agree, it’s very bleeping annoying!
I agree it's not fair but it's all based entirely on her looks and there's only one way that's going.Oh I get it, yes and for some, like Erica Davies, I absolutely get it as she genuinely carries genuine influence. However, I'm more outraged that the likes of Chloe put minimal effort in, do no research, don't even know how to pronounce a brand's name or test a product before filming herself so she could talk with a little bit of knowledge. It's jus so poor that she wings it and calls on the 'oh I am SO silly/forgetful/exhausted/busy' excuse ' while pouting prettily into the camera.
I know life is unfair, but it really does seem a complete travesty that so many of these spoilt, privileged princesses, like Chloe, just get to float through life making minimal effort and not breaking a sweat (despite barre class) and yet reaps the rewards.
Was just coming on here to say the same! Such a massive narcissist - “Can you see my bottom? Can you see it? Look here it is”How many times is she going to let us know how tiny her figure is in stories today yes we know you are slim and pretty and you’ve had a boob job!
But it’s so tiny, even for the smallest sized jeans, how could you see itWas just coming on here to say the same! Such a massive narcissist - “Can you see my bottom? Can you see it? Look here it is”
I see M&S are back to funding influencers... that neon-custard coloured cardigan was grim. As usual with M&S, a decent design in a lurid, awful tone. They never quite get it right.Not watched her stories for a while, has she done a u-turn in her no artificial fibres policy? A lot of acrylic/polyester in her latest recommendations #afflink
I thought the same. Was surprised we didn't get a story of her wearing her "pre-loved" camisole - prime "look at my tits" opportunity there, I'm amazed she didn't take advantage of it #lookatmytitsNot watched her stories for a while, has she done a u-turn in her no artificial fibres policy? A lot of acrylic/polyester in her latest recommendations #afflink
Can’t watch her anymore! God she’s a bleeping twit40year old woman in a tutu staring at a Christmas tree!!