I think Gordon Ramsays son was used as an example of a celebs kid who had not gone the 'My dads famous, gizza job' route, but had gone his own way, like Bruce Springsteens son.
I think there is a difference between people who have talent and happen to be the children of someone famous. They just happen to have had more doors open to them because of their parents, so for example, they have had access to expensive schools with excellent facilities that they have taken advantage of, or their talents have been noticed more easily because they are around film or music producers. I mean, my son wants to be an illustrator. He is a very talented artist, (If I may say so myself
)If I was a film star, too right I would send his stuff to someone I once worked with at Disney. Unfortunately, I'm not, so he'll have to go to art college like all the other struggling artists out there!
I doubt Matty Healy is in a world famous band because his parents were in some 2nd rate British soaps, or Tom Holland got the Spiderman gig because his dad was a mildly successful British comedian in the 90's, but they certainly had opportunities and money that other kids may not have had.
I think when it comes to nepotism its the Beckham's again, where none of the kids seem to have any talent in their chosen fields, but manage to get book deals and record contracts just because their parents have paid for their every whim. I think with modelling, its partly that children could inherit the looks and personalities of their parents ( I think Kaia Gerber is stunning for eg and looks like her mother) the things that helped their parents become famous in the first place. But again, there are some that don't have any of that and are there because magazines know that kids of famous parents sell magazines and get traffic on Instagram they can use for marketing.