Aahh OK, yes that makes sense re the Court.My understanding was it would be in the magistrates court so not in front of a jury who'd potentially be more swayed by the press.
The counter argument to names being kept out of the press is it stops anyone else coming forward - which I believe they did in the cases of Stuart Hall and Rolf Harris?
And of course about other victims coming forward.
I honestly don't know what the right move would be but something does need to be done. Especially when trashy newspapers don't just report it once, they drag it on and don't stick to basic facts.
This is what I think then someone has just offered another view point that if people weren't named then other victims may not come forward which could strengthen the case against them (they used Rolf Harris as an example of this)I agree with Caroline’s law. Nobody should have their name reported until they have been found guilty & possibly until they have exhausted the appeals process.
Let the rags find another way of paying the bills.