I’m sorry but most of this is factually incorrect. You cannot force a victim to behave a certain way. This is a victimless prosecution & he can change his version of events as he likes.There’s every chance he’ll be charged with perverting the course of justice or will be held in contempt of court for continuing to share details of the incident and the images. He has to have shared them before the papers because they are under the same strict guidance and legalities and will be well aware of that.
The theories about it being someone else’s blood etc; head injuries bleed profusely and quickly, the images easily look like the allegations that were made. With regard to her self harming, she received no medical treatment either at the scene or whilst in police custody, that would’ve been part of their statement and in the public domain. Also, if she had been found to have self harmed at the point of the alleged attack and subsequent arrest, it would’ve been very likely that she would’ve been sectioned, especially given the information that she had to be restrained later at the police station.
as for any potential self-harm for her-that would be for the defence to produce as a defence/mitigation.Any medical treatment for her following arrest will be part of the custody record as part of police’s duty to ensure her wellbeing whilst in custody. However it won’t be for the prosecution to disclose as part of their case.
There is a much higher threshold for sectioning than this. People attend A&E every day with suicide/self harm attempts much worse than this & are just sent away. The NHS is quite stretched in case u hadnt noticed. Also are you aware what sectioning means legally?
I’m all for a good gossip but this isn’t factually correct.