Great to see it clearly laid out like that ![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: š](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f642.png)
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: š](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f642.png)
oh FFS daily Mail, why did you put such a great public interest article behind your crappy paywall.
Well done to all who kept this saga going here and pointed out all the inconsistencies and downright lying.Great find, Zelda!
Iāll eat a plate of stale driveway croissants if the reporter hadnāt got most of that from here. Weāre āinternet sleuthsā doncherknow?<preens>
Really, one look at the fake tears in the video should have set all the alarm bells going. I'm quite a trusting soul, I guess (I gave money to Roadsidemum, FFS), but even I thought "that is not real".I have always been surprised that more people haven't asked questions about the initial Saltening. It's taken as gospel by the media and others that it was definitely real and very bad. Blocked and Reported did a good breakdown of why it was nonsense in the first place. The whole thing is built on a lie. I don't believe Carly set out to raise this much money, and it has been the undoing of her, but it has been a grift from the start - just intended to be a smaller one.
Does that tie in with her closing everything down?The article was written several weeks ago. Carly must have been dreading publication.
The timeline would suggest so.Does that tie in with her closing everything down?
He's heading somewhere far away where there are no allotmentsJudging by that barely literate [sic] statement, I guess "Whiskers" are no longer her media spokescat?