The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for yearsBritney has been attacking her family, that would her children's family, including KF for a while. People are now speaking up. As for taking the high road, yes she should, as a parent. If KF is the complete deadbeat pot smoking loser she says he is. she should set an example for her children. What she seems to want and what you would accept is her attacking people and everyone else shutting up. That's not the real world.
Except you have no basis for it being ‘a load of rubbish’The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
Jayden probably feels he has valid reasons to be angry. He essentially has not had a relationship with his mum for years and now doesn’t feel that is being mended or helped by Britney even now she is ‘free’.The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
See that is where we must disagree, a minor child has the right to be angry with his parent for their actions and, further, a child cannot 'freeload' off their parent who had a responsibility to support them. A parent needs to PARENT their child, she has not done that. As she has been incapable for whatever reason for doing so KF has done that job. He has been paid by Britney for doing that job. Just as any other primary parent would have been paid. She isn't the first celebrity to pay through the nose in child support, that is why people have children with celebrities; albeit it is usually the woman taking the payout. The difference is usually the paying parent has a relationship with the child. Why would it suit Jayden, if he is only interested in Britney's money, to ruin his relationship with Britney? as you say her need to 'pay' ends shortly, why wouldn't he be trying to keep a relationship so she will continue to support him? maybe because his interest goes beyond financial.
Exactly, if he was such a druggie he wouldn't have been given custody. Besides the boys; or at least Jayden seems a well adjusted nice teen.Also if Kfed was such a druggie waste of space would the children even have gone to him? He must be able to put up some kind of grown up, function human being act to have bought up two boys for 16 years.
Kids “freeloading” off of their parent from the age of 0-16… sure, very logical.The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
To be fair he does look like food is now addiction, quite a change from the dancer days!I think Kevin was addicted to McDonald’s at one point.
I absolutely assure you that fact-checkers have contacted Kevin and he knows what Britney is saying about him in the book. It may well have been what led to him giving the interview.Or Kevin told him to go on TV to talk about Britney, probably like he told him to secretly record her in private. Like I said Britney never spoke about Jayden or Kevin before they started piping up in the media and no one knows what's in her book or if it's even going to be published
Once again -- who the hell are you to speak so confidently about the validity of their statements? Are you personally involved? Do you know *any* of the individuals whose motives you feel so comfortable speaking authoritatively about?The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
The simple fact that a wealthy white woman who was the sole earner in the marriage lost custody to a non-working father itself speaks VOLUMES. Family courts in the US, and in California especially, *strongly* favor the mother. The degree of dangerous behavior Britney would have had to exhibit to lose custody is pretty bonkers and points to her incapacity, at least at that time, unless you are one of those truly far-side-of-the-moon stans who seem to think that the US judicial system is set up to harm Britney Spears specifically.Also if Kfed was such a druggie waste of space would the children even have gone to him? He must be able to put up some kind of grown up, function human being act to have bought up two boys for 16 years.
Britney did, tho. She griped that Kevin was not allowing her to see the kids when the boys were just babies. Kevin's attorney barked back immediately, as her recollection was inaccurate. I kind of feel that is what started this whole back and forth. Britney started it.Or Kevin told him to go on TV to talk about Britney, probably like he told him to secretly record her in private. Like I said Britney never spoke about Jayden or Kevin before they started piping up in the media and no one knows what's in her book or if it's even going to be published
Do you have any children yourself Spindlewhorl? I cant imagine anyone that does talking about them the way you do.The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
You really can’t reason with someone who thinks a child being dependent on a parent is freeloadingDo you have any children yourself Spindlewhorl? I cant imagine anyone that does talking about them the way you do.
Or K-FC FedHis nickname really suits him K-Fed
Rumour is he’s blackmailing her with other footage from the boys and is getting double what she’s court ordered to pay himDisagree - If you go on TV in front of millions to talk about his relationship with her in exchange for $2million then you deserve it back. HE also filmed her in private and gave the videos to his father which were probably used as blackmail before also being posted on social media
Well Jayden/Kevin did start it, she literally never spoke about them until they started piping up in the media lol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?