blueyfan3684
VIP Member
I think they often get it wrong sadly.The parole board definitely have a job on their hands, but they do really important work and I think they often get it right.
I think they often get it wrong sadly.The parole board definitely have a job on their hands, but they do really important work and I think they often get it right.
Then the appropriate people would put him in touch with ENT and have aids or adaptions made for him? But before that, his SM doesn’t mean he cannot communicate. They could write things down, etc. I’m sure the police have experienced interviewing a deaf person, it’s not rare to be hard of hearing?What if he became hard of hearing during the police interviews, though, which is more of a parallel with his selective mutism?
He isn’t the size of what I’d picture a typical teenage boy to look like.
Oh well you’ve seen something different to me then.He isn’t the size of what I’d picture a typical teenage boy to look like.
Not true about the surname changeThe head teacher’s tribute to Brianna is beautiful. It mentions her mum being the main support and I’ve heard that in many comments during the trial. I wonder what happened with her Dad as I know he turned up to the trial but didn’t seem to have a close relationship with her. When she changed her name she changed her surname to her mum’s surname too.
View attachment 2643148View attachment 2643149
I also thought this at first, then found another facebook page which posts photos regularlyif we're looking at the same page, there's only like 4 photos and none of them are children
Yep, joint enterpriseI agree with doubting/questioning if they both stabbed Brianna, however Justice Yip said that this is one if the questions the jury must ask themselves:
Are we sure that the defendant we are considering deliberately participated in the killing of Brianna, whether by stabbing her or causing, assisting or encouraging the other defendant to stab her?
They might not have both stabbed her, but I could 100% say yes to that question given what we have heard in the trial.
There are cases where the decision was made not to name, and cases where they are named, so we can look up the reasons the judge gave for eitherWhat do you class as exceptional circumstances then? Because I don’t see any reason in this case for them not to be named. I don’t believe it will hugely affect the other victims (people on the list) as they wouldn’t be identifiable purely from the public knowing who X and Y are. I don’t think the families should be taken into consideration as, like mentioned previously, this is surely the case for all those affected by any murder conviction.
It’s an exceptional case in terms of the violence and circumstances yes but I don’t think that warrants anonymity. I think the opposite in fact.
Application for what?Love how ITV made the application and no one bothered to show up…
I guess we have no idea how long the reports will take to complete and be reviewed2nd Feb is quite a while away really isn’t it…
A black cat.I searched her name and found nothing. Are there any clues you could give me, like her profile picture?
Ohh yes you are probably right!Drugs yes, but can't you buy those cannabis gummies off Amazon etc now? I think they're totally legal. Forgive me if I'm wrong.
Deadnaming is referring to a birth name - this can be once or multiple times and either unintentional or intentional. So she was ‘deadnamed’ in court but for obvious reasons.Yeah, I've always understood 'deadnaming' to be when someone continually uses a trans person's former name despite knowing it's against that person's wishes.
A one-off referral to Brianna's birth name wouldn't fall into that category.
What do you mean?A personality disorder is literally useless though. What will it actually achieve?
The mum looks younger?She looks a lot younger than I expected, or I’m just old