welshgirl2021
VIP Member
Love a bit of Walking with DerekS’mae! I often channel cheat on Derek with ITV Wales Weather’s lovely Ruth too![]()
Love a bit of Walking with DerekS’mae! I often channel cheat on Derek with ITV Wales Weather’s lovely Ruth too![]()
Is that definitely his official twitter account though?Has this been posted yet? HE has been active on Twitter today because he’s liked these two tweets…
View attachment 2298950
Ah I see! how bizarre.No, it's the young person claiming it's rubbish.
Might have been, whoever Dan Wooton worked forI thought it was The Mail Online? Not The Sun?
That was a basic coke and hookers scenario, no? Maybe a dominatrix involved?Frank Bough - that avuncular figure in the cosy pullovers. Was what he did illegal? That was a shocker and he fell on his sword so to speak.
Was 17 at the time but now is 20 xJust popping in to clarify something ... what age is the young person?
I thought they were 17 now I keep seeing 20.
Exactly that and I don’t blame him.Re. deletion of insta to get rid of messages.
We saw (alleged) evidence yesterday of him sending messages via LinkedIn too. That is still active.
View attachment 2298970
It’s very possible he just didn’t want all the photos of his mum being readily availablein case people like me do dodgy screenshots while looking at his watch
Just looks like one of those data scraping sites, nothing to see here.That really doesn't look like any kind of reliable source.
Current age is 20.Just popping in to clarify something ... what age is the young person?
I thought they were 17 now I keep seeing 20.
True enough, I'm just going on what they said about the word 'rubbish'The words "there is no truth in them" were also so used, though. Which is rather stronger.
She doesn't work for the BBC anymore.Which is ballsy considering the BBC pay her big bucks!
Well it’s too late for that. HE won’t be doing that again…if it is him.I have friends who do webcam work and have regulars who tip them a lot of money. My thoughts are that HE is a sugar daddy for this young person and the young person has been spending the money on drugs. The mum has found out HE is the one providing the money for the drugs and is so stressed out with her child being a drug addict that she's gone to the papers to try and cut off the funds for the drugs, that's why she doesn't want paying. He might not have known their age, he may very well have. The young person is probably denying it because they don't want to lose their payouts.
GotchaThe point is that Johnny Depp v The Sun was not about whether he was an abuser or not, it was whether The Sun had a reasonable expectation that he was based on the information they had at the time they printed the article. The US trial was a different issue as that was about whether he had abused Amber Heard and it was clear to any reasonable person that followed the trial that Amber was the abuser.
They won but was later discredited in the American case that I followed. Sorry I didn’t follow the sun trial as they lie anyways regardless.The whole Johnny Depp trial was not about whether he was a wife abuser but whether The Sun had a reasonable expectation that Johnny Depp was an abuser based on the information they had. They won, this is no different. If the Mother came to them with (potentially fabricated) evidence then they can print the story.