Timz
VIP Member
And that cow in Anneka, Nicola WalkerIt's illegal to make a British crime drama without Sarah Lancashire.
And that cow in Anneka, Nicola WalkerIt's illegal to make a British crime drama without Sarah Lancashire.
You what?Fake advertising for the BBC??
Yup, very likely, drug addicts will go to all lengths to fund their addiction.Here's what I think -
Young person sells nudes and has made £35k out of it.
They have also developed a drug habit.
Mum sees this and reports it all to the BBC, which is where the person who was giving the young person all of this money works.
Young person is hooked on drugs and needs money so decides to get a lawyer to say it's all rubbish, in the hopes the money for drugs will continue to flow.
But then why not come out straight away?They didn’t, apparently the letter was sent on Friday, The Sun just decided to ignore it.
It isIs that definitely his official twitter account though?
I think so yeah.Is that definitely his official twitter account though?
It‘s not what is stated hereI read earlier that they ran the story based on signed affidavits rather than actually seeing evidence 🫠🫠🫠🫠
Why has he been quiet for the last few days?!If nothing happened why is he suspended still / why won’t they just give us his name? Mr Innocent doesn’t sound as good
True, others have done similar.Surely if there was no truth to this, Huw would've come out with a statement such as "I am aware that xyzzy have made allegations against me in relation to xyzzy, I can confirm that there is no truth to these accusations and I have instructed my lawyers to do XYZ"
the silence speaks louder, no ?
It was The Sun. He put a picture on the front of the paper that was clearly edited as the bruise was much brighter than the pic shown in the US trial.Might have been, whoever Dan Wooton worked for
How would you prove that? unless his mother releases pictures of him using. Or a drug deal going down?Any evidence that the young person is actually a “crack addict” ?
Search on where?
Oh whoops - will edit thanks!!!That was Karen Matthews, Shannon was her daughter.
Had to clarify, it's already a minefield in here, we don't need to mix up perpetrator and victim.
Free? For the notary? Like Depp & Heard?As his parents have just said how did he afford a lawyer?
as things are moving fast apologies if someone has already answered. Once an allegation is put to a company the accused will almost always be suspended to allow for investigation, you’ve usually got to have some proof. That being said, someone I know went to their HR upset about disgusting messages, showed some of them and bam, investigation and suspension for the accused,HR didn’t even ask for response etc until after the suspension. They usually have to go with the person is telling the truth rather than believing it would be a lie at the first instanceIn the case that this is all in fact not true…
I wonder how much it would take for the BBC or another company to suspend someone. What level of proof would it require/ how easy would it be to ruin someone’s reputation
Not saying that’s what’s happened, just interesting