BBC Presenter Scandal #3

[teadropsx]

Fake advertising for the BBC??

 

[RebelUtd]

The plot thickens

 

[ishant]

GB news just said his parents stand by their claims - breaking news apparently

yet another reason why the person wouldn’t want it to come out perhaps

 

[pommobear]

Still doesn’t add up to me. There’s loads of pictures of his mum on his Twitter account. Just click “Media” and the first one of many is about 4th/5th down.

I think it’s more likely that he wanted to disassociate his account from some salacious DMs, personally - and that the most spicy examples were on Insta.

He'd have done it days ago if it were that.

 

[Timz]

Well the GBN deep delve will start 9pm so hope someone can create the next thread very shortly!

 

[Hattie769]

He won’t be on.

Exactly!

 

[catdod5678]

You've pretty much hit the nail on the head there. The damage is done.

And damage is recovered from anyone making defamatory statements (1) with deep pockets to ensure the defamed victim is not harmed and possibly (2) group of social media users that went viral to send a message and make legal precedent that gossipy statements made on social media or dark corners of the internet are not outside very conservative and prescriptive UK laws

 

[Trafalgar]

I thought it was The Mail Online? Not The Sun?

It was defo The Scum in the depp case.

 

[Timz]

The Steeples live has been removed from YouTube apparently, and apparently he has said it's because he shouldn't have said some things?

This is a report from my friend so can someone verify?

Dayumn I saw some of that on YT and it was very comprehensive and completely agreed about the BBC being institutionalised and self-serving

 

[Ndrangheta]

The point is that Johnny Depp v The Sun was not about whether he was an abuser or not, it was whether The Sun had a reasonable expectation that he was based on the information they had at the time they printed the article. The US trial was a different issue as that was about whether he had abused Amber Heard and it was clear to any reasonable person that followed the trial that Amber was the abuser.

I thought it was The Mail Online? Not The Sun?

 

[FenellaTheWitch]

Just popping in to clarify something ... what age is the young person?

I thought they were 17 now I keep seeing 20.

 

[rocket1234]

I personally don’t think that’s real. The witch hunt for Scoff (rightly so) would have unearthed lots of stuff. All of a sudden it comes out when everyone is speculating. Maybe his lawyers are involved. But doesn’t mean he would need to be public about it. If that was real there would be some sort of order to have it removed by now. As it could be used in court. I asked my gran what she would do if she was in HE position. Just for an age perspective. She said nothing if she wasn’t the person involved. She would be concentrating on keeping the family out of the way and getting things in order to sue everyone and everything any way she could as quite likely his career is over regardless of innocence. It’s tarnished him now

This is just my pov

 

[Jwren]

coz they are twunts. All about sales and revenue from the clicks. They dont care who they hurt.

I’m talking about the parents

 

[Trafalgar]

She doesn't work for the BBC anymore.

Ah my mistake. I thought she was still with them. Maybe bitter then at leaving.

 

[pixxyy]

We still don't know it is HE.

We don't have proof those phone calls happened.

yeah could still be another Man