Watching the remnants of The One Show reminds me of This Morning and the tense atmosphere post-Philth 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Just put sky news on and their news reel at the bottom said that the young persons lawyer says nothing unlawful happened
I just wanna know how I would be sued tbh 
is that how shady the bbc are? They can find me? And take my tv I don’t watch the bbc on? 🫣
is that how shady the bbc are? They can find me? And take my tv I don’t watch the bbc on? 🫣
Has it been confirmed that she got no money?
The original statement was that she didn't want to be paid for this. Looking at it now, it seems like The Sun saying "we're more trustworthy because we have not paid for this story"
currently eating a bowl of cereal for tea. Tonight's tea in my house is everybody fend for themselves. there's been some bacon fried, a heated up bowl of spag bol and whatever else I don't know about that's been going on in the kitchen.
i imagine something like this happens-
the young person was getting money for his contact with the presenter, without a scooby doo who he was. The mother comes along - and recognizes him sitting on his sofa in his pants and tells her child who it is. Her child then realizes that they can get a lot more money out of this situation this then means they can afford more crack and their addiction spirals- the mother now doesn’t know what to do- she tells the presenter to stop but he can’t because he’s being blackmailed by her child who would probably have a wealth of messages etc that the presenter doesn’t want made public.
She knows this is what is happening, and is angry at the presenter for putting his career before her child’s drug habit, she chooses to go to their employer first, this does nothing so she goes to the papers as she can’t go to the police because her child is blackmailing the presenter.
the young person was getting money for his contact with the presenter, without a scooby doo who he was. The mother comes along - and recognizes him sitting on his sofa in his pants and tells her child who it is. Her child then realizes that they can get a lot more money out of this situation this then means they can afford more crack and their addiction spirals- the mother now doesn’t know what to do- she tells the presenter to stop but he can’t because he’s being blackmailed by her child who would probably have a wealth of messages etc that the presenter doesn’t want made public.
She knows this is what is happening, and is angry at the presenter for putting his career before her child’s drug habit, she chooses to go to their employer first, this does nothing so she goes to the papers as she can’t go to the police because her child is blackmailing the presenter.
Which is ballsy considering the BBC pay her big bucks!
I mean, the police won't be investigating it because the alleged victim has given a statement saying it's bull.But the mother can’t be doing it for money surely as she refused any payment from The Sun for the article she just wanted the man punished for what he had done? That doesn’t scream money grabbing to me.
Now the BBC have got involved and all of a sudden this kid has a lawyer (how?) denying anything happened and the police said they’re not investigating criminal charges merely based on just having a zoom call with the BBC? I know who stinks ofmost for me and it’s not the mother! It’s going to get covered up like JS!
Even if the CPS gave the nod to prosecute, a court case in that situation would be impossible to win.
Might have been, whoever Dan Wooton worked for
How would someone find people who want to pay £35k for photos?? Asking for a friend
Well, if its photos over 3 years as we're led to be belived, it's £35k for photos of an alleged crack addict, so I guess people will pay for all kinds of stuff online
Just looks like one of those data scraping sites, nothing to see here.
I’ve just read the Daily Mail and it said the police are not looking into any criminal charges after having just a Zoom meeting with the BBC
She's now a shill for Rupert Murdoch. Who owns The Sun.
This is tattle, I didn’t think we had to caveat every post with ‘if this is true’.
People are saying it looks like a deep fake
Regarding the photo, does anyone know if it's possible to definitively say if something is AI or photoshopped? I know we can say "that brickwork looks wonky, his face looks weird there" but is there an expert out there who can say to a court "This image is certainly fake"?
Apologies if this has already been mentioned but I’ve been away and my mum was dog sitting for us. She just sent me this message as she records everything as she always falls asleep!!
Attachments
- Status