Ah I see! how bizarre.No, it's the young person claiming it's rubbish.
Ah I see! how bizarre.No, it's the young person claiming it's rubbish.
I miss the good ole days of Platty Jubes.Phrase of 2023:
Unwise but not illegal
The story was always about how the BBC had failed to investigate in the mothers viewI know The Sun are scummy but surely they wouldn’t push this story against a heavyweight household name if they didn’t have evidence
How can we be making excuses for him when there is no evidence that he has even done anything yet?Amazed at the amount of people making excuses for HE just because his public image up until know have been clean and family friendly. Reminds me of Jimmy Saville
It’s just when I think of your posts they are always about your lust for Hancock, and your hatred for Scofield, who you have gone hard on in the past (for good reason but you were particularly vociferous on PS). Yet most of your posts last few days have jumped on the don’t believe it of HE, to palpable relief that this new twist has emerged. And yet, it looks like he is someone who has deployed the same MO as PS, and yet he seems to be getting, not a pass, but a more benign approach from you. So, I asked if you were Welsh, and washe was a Welsh hero, and that would explain the disparity of approach.What has being Welsh got to do with it? He isn’t a hero to Wales that I’m aware of. He’s not even my favourite newsreader (that would be Clive) At the moment we don’t have any real evidence to support him having done anything wrong. He may have done. Time will tell. The Sun shouldn’t have run the story without checking the facts first. They have a long history of being total bleeps. There is also a ton of evidence about Schofield. We’ve known about him on here for three years. Before any of this I’d never heard anything negative about HE.
It’s bizarre that there’s so many defending a relationship (or something sexual) between someone near retirement with someone of school age.You don't think that there is anything off about a 60 year old having a sexual relationship with a 16 year old? I thought we'd moved past this.
Thank you, you said this much more eloquently than I did.The mother, The Sun, The BBC, the presenter, the young person.
People are desperately searching for a simple story with a villain they can bay for the blood of.
It looks messy, complex and as if a number of individuals made mistakes they tont want to take any responsibility for.
Why do we find it so hard to reserve our judgment, speculation and vitriol even when we know we lack facts?
i thought this too. I’ve heard a number of stories from people who have said that the police/court/media process was more devastating than anything they went through before, and how they wish none of it had ever come out. They wanted the situation to stop, but for the authorities to have never been involved. Their involvement made things worse. Not just SA, but DV, child abuse situations etc.sorry haven't caught up as it's literally impossible to, but as someone who's been SA'd has it not been considered that perhaps the young person involved just doesn't want all this to come out? like, i personally never involved the police as i didn't want to relive everything, and would probably brand my mum telling others my situation as 'rubbish' too if i didn't want it to get out
(sorry if i've got the wrong end of the stick as i've only skimmed through articles)
Youngster told the sun Friday apparentlyThe youngsters denial clears nothing up and just creates more questions. Why wait several days to announce it's untrue? Why not straight away? Why would your mother make it all up? Why would the Sun publish an article without evidence? Why are the police involved? Why was the presenter suspended by the BBC if there was no strong evidence?![]()
Presenter and a young person exchange messages.
Presenter pays to see their bumhole.
Young person wants more money.
Presenter gets pissed off.
Young person's mother finds out and goes ballistic.
Press find out.
Tattle goes mental.
Young person realises their meal ticket is out the window.
Young person backtracks and suddenly has money to pay for a lawyer or finds one who is willing to take the case for free (!).
Presenter's career is still screwed.
Young person gets no more money.
There is no good outcome for anyone except gossips.
Fin.