It kind of makes sense doesn’t it? I think you expressed it better. If there is no intent, this "we did everything possible to hide identity" just looks too lame - they are not that naive/ inexperienced surely. Interesting if Netflix is aware - probably not? But then wouldnt they check? Im so curious, but in reality we would probably never know
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
All Netflix have done is asked an actress to put on a Scottish voice. Fiona states she's never been as big as 'Martha' in size (Fiona is a horrid person) . Even if they'd chosen a woman with a London accent, Fiona would still have come forward - she's an attention seeker
I think he knew she was a nutcase and didn’t want to push her too far.
Exactly. No one forced Fiona to come and do and interview (that has now got 14m views.)
she could’ve stayed in the shadows and waited for it to blow over.
she wants money and fame. I suspect Netflix will win. As someone mentioned above this is a true story of Donny and Martha. Not Richard and Fiona.
......and people knew of her after being in newspapers years ago - that gave her true name! She's known for her frequent stalking harassment.....Why didn't she sue the newspapers who revealed her true identity back then?
This is interesting: A person can only be compensated for injury to the reputation they had at the time of publication. If that person already had a bad reputation which is relevant to the defamation, that will reduce the harm, and reduce the damages, sometimes to zero
I’m not surprised by this at all.Richard Gadd's ex-colleague says his 'stalker' was targeted as a joke
Richard Gadd's ex-colleague says his 'stalker' was targeted as a joke
EXCLUSIVE: The bar worker claimed Fiona Harvey was among vulnerable women exploited by male members of staff at the Hawley Arms in Camden, north London.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well you could say that joke backfired, but he has what he wanted, fame. I thought it would be a matter of time until witnesses started coming forward.
---
It really is so disgusting! and so dated too. Like surely we’re passed this nonsense!
If you know someone is a nutcase WHY give them a platform and opportunities to continue their abuse??? Piers did this for his own profile and money! This makes him a twit!!! I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, I hope to duck he becomes her next obsession and he understands what he has done for bleeping clicks, likes and money! He’s part of the trendy ‘parasitic journalism’ that should be bleeping quashed!! He’ll jump on any bandwagon, dress it up as ‘exclusive hard hitting news’ when it’s all for the sad pathetic bastards ego boost! Utter hole! And when she starts on his family I hope to duck everyone tells him it’s COMPLETELY HIS OWN bleeping DOING!!!
It would sort of serve him right at this point. Apparently he had Laura Wray on his show too - the solicitor who gave FH her first job. That poor woman was hounded for 5 years by FH who reported her to social services for abusing her child (a made up lie) and put her through hell.
Apparently she had to get some sort of court order to stop the harassment. Piers then had a discussion panel another day and dismissed FH as a troll not a proper stalker because she'd finally left Laura alone!
Laura found out that FH repeated her vile behaviour in her next job and after she was sacked by the next firm of solicitors she did exactly the same to her 2nd boss (a man this time) where she phoned social services and said he was abusing his children.
If Fiona does get a pay out, I hope her victims sue her! She's vile
This whole debarcle pretty much points out why victims don’t come forward, because there’s always a bunch of dickheads that want to victim blame and turn a vile perpetrator into a ‘victim’…bleeping disgusting!
‘Martha’ turned up to his work, his home, harassed and harmed his family…but poor Fiona Harvey, stalked a lawyer and others spouting vile lies…people on the internet found her so she’s a poor poor victim!
.....her lawyers only completed the basic DBS check........they've not carried out an advanced check........whoops 
The advanced one shows information on a person that the police find relevant - like accusations for example
The advanced one shows information on a person that the police find relevant - like accusations for example
Unfortunately stuff gets removed from even an enhanced DBS after a while. If she was nicked years ago it likely wouldn't show up. This link explains it all quite well:
I think there's going to be lots of stuff coming out though especially if that girl's blog from the psych unit is true and she does have either diagnosed MH issues, convictions, or both. She said she didn't go to prison, she never actually said she wasn't e.g. detained in hospital, obviously not the same as prison but think people would find that relevant info
I think there's going to be lots of stuff coming out though especially if that girl's blog from the psych unit is true and she does have either diagnosed MH issues, convictions, or both. She said she didn't go to prison, she never actually said she wasn't e.g. detained in hospital, obviously not the same as prison but think people would find that relevant info
Why is there no date of issue on that? Where is that from?
Spent convictions won’t show up on a basic CRB check
They need the enhanced for the trial.......it looks to me like that is an old one that Fiona herself has produced. My daughter had to apply for one back in 2018 for college (as she was working with vulnerable adults) - hers is green - like this :
Yeah lawyer’s gonna need an enhanced check which discloses everything I think including cautions etc
I thought she had just changed her surname but it looks like she changed her middle name too. 