It’s fine if a woman isn’t maternal. I’m not. Not at all. I don’t have the mental space or patience for a child. Not even for looking after them for more than a few hours. What isn’t fine is if in knowing that you’re not maternal, you go ahead and have a child anyway - a whole little life that is your responsibility for the next two decades and, for the first few years at the very least, relies wholly on you for survival. Even worse is complaining about said child at every opportunity, in a public space where he will be able to read it all when he is older.
I don’t believe that that picture of her is postpartum. Firstly, her stomach is too round and smooth: now, obviously, I haven’t seen too many pp tums but, when Princess Kate stood outside the hospital, her bump had softened and dropped. Secondly, where’s all the bleeding? Even I know about gouts and gushes and vernix after normal childbirth - and wouldn’t it be ten times worse if you’d had such a significant tear? And thirdly, as others have said, the fact that she’s standing - not just standing, but *posing* - really doesn’t ring true. I think she posted this picture to make other mothers feel inadequate. Forget the all-important bonding with the child: this is just another example of her indulging in her primary relationship. The mirror.
In that case, shouldn’t she be doxxing, harrassing and threatening herself?