Ah but the comments section can be moderated. Tattle can’t.The irony of being happily papped by the DM for the Online Safety Bill when she knows the comments section on DM is more brutal than Tattle. And she’s more than happy to feature on that POS site.
Anything for fame
That is absolutely horrendous! Just horrifying! How does anyone support someone with her attitude? Who finds publicising Black maternal mortality as something that is not ‘interesting’? Are we to extrapolate from that the theory that she is only interested in white motherhood? Given her outspoken claims about her so-called support of marginalised, stigmatised and mistreated populations, I find it incredibly suspicious that she rejected the idea of helping this cause. What does everyone else think - or am I reading too much into this due to my profound dislike and distrust of Ms James?As far as I remember those were the words yeah, that was back when I genuinely followed her instead of hate following. And I remember that’s the point when I realised she wasn’t the person she likes to make out.
I closed that account when she outed me for leaving a negative comment and I started getting shit from people.
In the interest of fairness (not that’s she’s fair but we don’t have to sink to her level) it could be seen as performative and jumping on a band wagon if very white middle class, no real evidence of diversity in her life Ashley were to champion the cause. Yes she could absolutely mention it, point people to someone who really understands it and not being interested enough to share is sickening but I don’t think she would be the right person to go hard on this subject. She was probably scared of the questions and showing herself up but rightly so if she doesn’t really know about it. We know she has to be an expert at everything but at least she hasn’t claimed to be, or be a real ally if she’s not.That is absolutely horrendous! Just horrifying! How does anyone support someone with her attitude? Who finds publicising Black maternal mortality as something that is not ‘interesting’? Are we to extrapolate from that the theory that she is only interested in white motherhood? Given her outspoken claims about her so-called support of marginalised, stigmatised and mistreated populations, I find it incredibly suspicious that she rejected the idea of helping this cause. What does everyone else think - or am I reading too much into this due to my profound dislike and distrust of Ms James?
You’re most probably right! Although…can’t Ms James become an instant expert on any subject simply by researching for three hoursIn the interest of fairness (not that’s she’s fair but we don’t have to sink to her level) it could be seen as performative and jumping on a band wagon if very white middle class, no real evidence of diversity in her life Ashley were to champion the cause. Yes she could absolutely mention it, point people to someone who really understands it and not being interested enough to share is sickening but I don’t think she would be the right person to go hard on this subject. She was probably scared of the questions and showing herself up but rightly so if she doesn’t really know about it. We know she has to be an expert at everything but at least she hasn’t claimed to be, or be a real ally if she’s not.
I’m not saying it’s ok to ignore, she could/should have said ‘this isn’t something I know much about but endeavour to educate myself on and understand. Here are some sources I’m learning from, I hope you can to’ but it’s better to ignore than pretend you care, pretend you’re an expert, do it for box ticking etc imo
She has more free time than anyone else with a job and a toddler that I’ve ever seen.She just chats some very irrelevant stuff.
Firstly her eating a pepper, then oh I’ve been gifted a new carrier, someones cleaned my carpets & now when will poor old Ashley get time to sort her baby stuff out. You organise your own diary so just plan a day in your diary or do your normal and palm him off on NNB I’m sure you will!
Especially at a time like right now!!! Her lack of awareness of her privilege is sickening…what is she going to do with the other ones *kindly gifted*?View attachment 1892486
Best and fashionable in your opinion because they gift them to all the ‘celebs’.
Able to feed out and about - you weren’t isolated and stuck at home all day then?
But, most of all, you couldn’t possibly ask Artipoppe to gift this one on to someone actually in need, or you yourself pass this brand new one on directly to your local baby bank or sling library, as you ALREADY HAVE ONE and because you HAVE SHITLOADS OF MONEY? No? Course not.
I thought gender didn’t matter anyway? Why can’t ‘baby girl’ be carried in the same one as Alfie?! If he can’t wear a T-shirt with aEspecially at a time like right now!!! Her lack of awareness of her privilege is sickening…what is she going to do with the other ones *kindly gifted*?
Totally agree. The other one she has is totally gender neutral so she has absolutely no need for a new one! Baby Princess will be head to toe in bows and her room will be decorated top to bottom in pinkI thought gender didn’t matter anyway? Why can’t ‘baby girl’ be carried in the same one as Alfie?! If he can’t wear a T-shirt with acartoon dinosaurhorrid predator on it, why should ‘baby girl’ be carried in pink?
She is the queen of double standards.
I just looked to see what price the 'best and most fashionable' baby carrier cost....£330!!!! That's madness, I could never consider spending so much on something like that, we have a good second hand carrier that did just fine for my boy and will be just fine for the baby on the way. We don't need a new carrier for a new baby and I'm pretty sure Ashley doesn't need another carrier for her new baby. But then the new baby for her is probably just as much of a fashion accessory as that bloody carrierView attachment 1892486
Best and fashionable in your opinion because they gift them to all the ‘celebs’.
Able to feed out and about - you weren’t isolated and stuck at home all day then?
But, most of all, you couldn’t possibly ask Artipoppe to gift this one on to someone actually in need, or you yourself pass this brand new one on directly to your local baby bank or sling library, as you ALREADY HAVE ONE and because you HAVE SHITLOADS OF MONEY? No? Course not.
very true. I particularly enjoy her talking about taxYou’re most probably right! Although…can’t Ms James become an instant expert on any subject simply by researching for three hoursand reading her notes aloud on Gammon TV? And isn’t she delusional/clueless enough to go charging into any arena where she can receive attention, regardless how it is received (or she’ll doxx the people who call her out, wholly careless of the consequences of her actions)? But you’re right - she’d be an absolutely awful advocate for this cause. Perhaps we should be grateful that she isn’t ‘interested’ in it rather than charging in with her usual misinformation, word salad, typos and me-me-me mantra…
Came on to say exactly this. It grinds my gears that all instahuns get free stuff and keep it for themselves but it makes it worse when they keep banging on about the cost of living crisis!Especially at a time like right now!!! Her lack of awareness of her privilege is sickening…what is she going to do with the other ones *kindly gifted*?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?