oshare
VIP Member
Was your comment a reaction to my comment or more general? Because I wasn't criticizing her I think? (genuine question)the thing is if her baby was developing more slowly, people would be blaming it on annie. we would hear an abundance of criticism about her lack of colour in the toys and baby stuff she gets, too much cleanliness and organisation, not enough variety in food/too healthy, didn't BF long enough with blame on her own aesthetics, etc etc etc. this happens with every vlogger that has a baby lol. so fair enough that she's allowed to take some pride in the lifestyle she gives her baby and her baby's development
What I said about the fish was for Annie, not about her baby.
No clue what the kid eats tbh but I'm assuming they feed her well, Annie is totally in love with the baby. In that regard I'm not worried the slightest
Definitely. You can still be a (semi) mommy vlogger without showing your kids. I used to watch a vegan channel way back and she would do food videos on her baby (and later child) without showing her child or only an arm or hand or so. And if she did ran into the shot she would always blur her child. Nobody knew what she looked like (unless you knew her IRL). She stopped doing YT after a while but I really enjoyed her approach.I did not watch the video but I hope her daughter sues her for putting content of her online as soon as she is 18.
It‘s careless and irresponsible and too normalized in my opinion.
Annie could easily do the same. She has all the time in the world and she already currates and perfects her videos to the point most of it is set in scene or fake, so it's not like it would make much of a difference tbh.