Ok here we go:
The conservative prime minister of Sweden, Ulf Kristersson held a kind of meet and greet - open discussion kind of thing in Gothenburg. A lot of protesters attended the meeting, asking questions about why Sweden has not taken a stand against Israel. Kristersson made a gigantic freudian slip and said "Israel has the right to genoc.." before correcting himself. Of course it made the news and the conservative party and their voters are scrambling to save face, pretending it's not clear what he was about to say (it is). I'm guessing she posted the video of him slipping up.
The person she's responding to wrote that he did not say "folkm" which are the first five letters in genocide in swedish (folkmord) arguing he said "folk" which just mean people. They are accusing Rakel of spreading false information and making sweden appear in bad light, feeding conspiracy theories. Rakel is responding and saying it is clear what he was about to say, and that racism and oppression is grows in silence, especially in a country like Sweden where people are afraid to go out on a limb and stand up for what's right (I don't fully agree but that's another discussion). She then writes that instead of worrying how the world sees us, we should worry about people and their suffering, in Sweden and abroad. She's asking if the conspiracy theory is that Sweden did not vote for cease fire (we abstained, and it's obviously not a secret or anything).
The second slide says that the biggest conspiracy theory is that swedes think very highly of themselves, that we are not good people but we think we are. That when it comes to injustice we are racist like every other white country (we are, and noone thinks otherwise). She says that we care selectively, and we have a prime minister who shows us that every day. Then she writes "Imagine having a prime minister who fully believes genocide is ok, and a country full of people who are too afraid to protest because we want Sweden to appear just and good. The truth is more important. The children in Gaza are more important."
She's not wrong, but she argues with a lot of cliches without nuance and depth, and she has an air of someone who has spent time abroad and then comes home to tell everyone the lay of the land. To my eyes, she appears out of touch with the political climate in Sweden in general. She lives in a very small wealthy bubble, a lot of her friends are rich kids with made up jobs and financial security who live far away from poor(er) people and never meet anyone with different views or different upbringing.
The last slide is just her correcting herself because she used the wrong word for prime minister. It's because she thinks in english.
My god, she is insufferable.
