Oh. I see Rebecca has been taking tips from the queen of moaning about imaginary trollzzz. Mrs Hinch
Weight aside (and I don't think Nina is overweight) she would have to be the height of an average child double her age (which I highly doubt) for them not to be way too long. For the record, I do think Nina looks older than 4 and she likely is tall for her age, but she's still talking shite.I’m sorry no way on earth is Nina is 7/8 tights. Rebecca is just stingey. If she was actually wearing that size at her age then it should be a bloody wake up call to her mother.
And her hips at least 11cms bigger than they should be? For a child apparently so much taller she’s never mentioned centiles.Call me crazy to have looked this up but this is winding me up way too much. Next size guide gives age 8 height as 128cm. WHO percentile charts give the 99.6th centile ('super tall') for a 4 year old girl as 112 cm. So judging by what she is saying, Nina is off the chart and is even 16 cm taller than a 'super tall' 4 year old. Sure.
Well said. Totally deluded. I’ve worked in the EYFS for years and it’s clear to see.If she led a normal lifestyle (if her food groups weren’t just cheese and pork belly and Costa’s) ppl would be less inclined to comment as yes sometimes it is normal for a child to be bigger than average but there is a very clear link between her lifestyle and Nina’s weight (and her own).
shes deluded.