She’s obsessed. And making him into the celebrity he so badly wants to be.Has anyone seen her stories today?
Regardless of whether hes guilty or innocent, i'm sure we all have her own theories!, but he does not need to deal with her constant camera workI think that’s creepy, photographing people without consent!
Asking a small child to comment about having an erotic sex sign in her bedroom......................REALLYHas anyone seen her stories today?
Asking a small child to comment about having an erotic sex sign in her bedroom......................REALLY
He is in first class. It is so weird.I couldn’t believe my ears and the poor child squirming after she said it.
I’m reporting this stupid bint to the Indo, asking if it’s ok for an on payroll reporter to continue to film people without their knowledge. And of course her weird obsession with Ian Bailey
I’ve cited her as a reporter on their payroll filming all around her as if on an assignment . And it’s a grey area GDPR wise filming without a warningWhile I agree her obsession with alluding to the fact she's BFFS with Ian/Jules is a bit odd.....there's nothing illegal with filming/photography in a public place however so I'm not quite so sure what your email would cite.
It's not a GDPR grey area.... you can photograph/film in public as you please.(there are some exceptions, such as where someone would expect to have a reasonable level of privacy... as in, if you were camped out in a tree with a camera pointed in someone's bathroom window). GDPR and photography are quite different, a photo isn't a breach of GDPR.I’ve cited her as a reporter on their payroll filming all around her as if on an assignment . And it’s a grey area GDPR wise filming without a warning
Grand so, let me know how you’d feel wandering Schull to be on this bints InstagramIt's not a GDPR grey area.... you can photograph/film in public as you please.(there are some exceptions, such as where someone would expect to have a reasonable level of privacy... as in, if you were camped out in a tree with a camera pointed in someone's bathroom window). GDPR and photography are quite different, a photo isn't a breach of GDPR.
I've not said I've agreed with it, in fact I've already said I find it weird but there's nothing legally wrong with it, and it would be incorrect to smile and nod and beat the GDPR drum when it's not of relevance. Unfortunately feelings don't really come in to things!Grand so, let me know how you’d feel wandering Schull to be on this bints Instagram
Get in the fu***ing bin