Mascaragirl
VIP Member
I wonder if he’s going to actually get out of hospital at this point. I’m praying he does. But it doesn’t look good.
Attachments
-
56.4 KB
What did he do? I mean proven stuff, convictions, stuff you actually saw him do.I cannot believe people on here are actually tryibgvto excuse what Andrew did, which I fully believe otherwise the news night interview wouldn't have been such a car crash and he'd be cooperating with the FBI.
While the Queen is ceremonial role, she is still a very rich woman with powerful connections so of course she's going to protect her Son, even though she shouldn't. I know they hired a PR crisis team to try and deflect attention from him and god know s what lawyers have been hired to keep everyone at bay.
BP have had a copy of the Oprah interview in advance to determine a response.. and it’s thought M confirms that there was a rift with CatherineI wonder if William will decide to have a row with the press for some reason to help retain the respect of some of the Harry and Meghan anti media brigade
I missed Piers was it good? Haven't read the allegations yet either
I believe Meghan is capable of it, didn't her and Harry go through a lot of staff. She's a disruptor.
exactly that, you can see it happening
You get a book, you get a book, everybody gets a book.
Ridiculous. I think Harry will go back for the funerals but Meghan (and Archie) won’t step foot in the country again.Oh if PP dies or The Queen or even his father , Harry won’t come back at all.
The family will be frosty but Meghan won’t let him incase he gets sucked back in and he ends up realising he misses them.
I bet he did want to come back to support his grandmother, but I reckon MM wouldn’t let him because she can’t be alone and it will continue to be about her.
Wouldn’t be surprised if there was an embargo on his death until Monday.Does anyone have an awful feeling that BBC Scotland accidentally ran the obit because he is dead?![]()
That's how I read it in the media but when I saw the clip at lunchtime it actually sounded like two seperate things.I think its the context in which skin colour was discussed that is the issue. From what I gather the sussexes have alleged it was discussed around titles and security but I may have picked it up wrong.
Yeah but even that recounts the false tiara story.FYI this was from December 2020, make of it what you will - why Kate was crying.
I just thought I’d post it and you can make of it what you will.
l
Not the only one.I don't know what the truth of this situation is and none of us may ever know the truth. But what I do know/feel is that Piers Morgan should be not be in the position he is in. Watching clips back from his performance this morning is actually quite shocking. He dismissed the suicidal thoughts of a woman as lies, Chris Ship and his co host took him to task over it but that was still broadcast.
I don’t think William will speak to him again after his wife through Kate under the bus, that brother bond is broken.Philip has form, I was surprised that the crowns (work of fiction) interpretation of him didn't get more (bad) press but the British public tend to brush it aside as a case of foot in mouth. Charles has done a lot for other cultures and faiths, though people do say his charities benefit from those actions. Its hard to know what to believe anymore. It's a very serious issue though and it probably should be spoken about outside of magazine shows.
It isn’t for Meghan to name who made the comment, as it was made to Harry, who revealed the comment and then failed to provide any context whatsoever. I don’t dispute their experience and right to be upset about it. However, Harry has talked about wanting to repair his relationship with his father and brother - who has ultimately sent under the bus. I don’t think there’s any coming back from that. And I also think that acknowledging that the royals are prevented from making comments - which they didn’t like - but then proceeding to make a lot of allegations again people and speak for other people (H saying that C & W are trapped) when you know they don’t have the right to reply isn’t very fair. A lot of this should have been dealt with privately.
I’m sure the daily Mail will get the lowdown!It's been a rumour put out, with the addendum that it's not been said whether they get money through ads etc.
Her father in law was the Prime Minister of Canada.They all attended the wedding and I doubt they would say a bad word about her as most arent A lidt actors and are probably mindful of their own careers.
I do find it odd that she seems to have no childhood friends. Jessica Mulroney seemed to be the closest friend and its not like they went back decades. She is married to like a billionaires son or something so she serves a purpose.
It wont get that many because it's randomly on at 5pm when Commonwealth day is not usually mentioned in the press.The Queens commonwealth speech tomorrow, who’s gonna be watching ? Do people think Britons are gonna stand with the queen or are they gonna boycott and not watch it at all ?
Apologies that it’s the daily MailApparently it has been confirmed by Oprah today that the senior person that made the racist comment was neither the Queen or Prince Phillip.