The Radford Family #23 Radfords are escaping one by one, including Millie and her secret son

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I can't see why Sue would be annoyed with Millie. She's fulfilling her role as chief baby maker perfectly well. Since Sue's out of action forever now. Someone's gotta pick up the slack and keep the adorable newborns coming and the audience enthralled. Don't worry Katie's next then Ellie and on and on.
Because it’s Sue who wants the new baby. We all know her grandchildren don’t mean much to her.

Wtf is that excuse for a Christmas tree of Sophie’s. She is just as chavvy as her mother. It’s horrendous.
Money but zero taste. Bunch of chavs.

People aren't exactly saying how lovely that a 20 year old is up the duff for a second time already. I think most people are just genuinely happy for her that she appears to have escaped the madhouse and the controlling clutches of Sue. If a second pregnancy was what it took to be the catalyst for her to realise she needed to get out of that toxic environment and take control of her own life, so be it. It may not be ideal but good luck to her. I genuinely hope for the children's sakes that they are happy together and succeed at making a go of things. It doesn't necessarily mean 20 more children will follow. Sophie said she intended to stop at 3 and has stuck to that.
A 20 year old with 2 kids isn’t shocking. Her mother started when she was 13, at least Mille was of decent age. Her baby seems happy enough. I don’t like her but that’s not to say she won’t be a good mum to both of her kids.

And this is why you shouldn't believe everything in the newspapers
Stunningly bad? Did they miss out the word bad?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
because she reported it in the UK and 16 is the legal age here. If she reported in Florida then who knows what would have happened!
He'd be in jail, end of. Finished a 12 hour shift in paediatric nursing so this is my daytime. A 16 year old is a child, a child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
He'd be in jail, end of. Finished a 12 hour shift in paediatric nursing so this is my daytime. A 16 year old is a child, a child.
Whats worse is that his step-daughter is now 16! They have a very strange relationship.. almost flirty. But I dont blame the step-daughter at all, it is him that's in the wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
No ones saying he’s not a creep, can’t stand the inghams.
But in the eyes of the law he did nothing wrong where as Noel did sleep with a minor.
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
 
  • Wow
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
she was 13...! Just out of primary school, i'm sure she wasn't 'jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated'. It's a bit worrying that you are a paediatric nurse and talking about a child in this way. Almost victim blaming.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 43
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
At 13? Possibly 12? My kid of that age can’t always make up her mind what she wants for dinner. Do not blame a child for being groomed. Your opinion may be honest, but it’s very dangerous and wrong. I don’t care if Sue thought she knew what she wanted at 12/13, the fact remains and this is the part you are missing, she was a child for gods sake.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 43
she was 13...! Just out of primary school, i'm sure she wasn't 'jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated'. It's a bit worrying that you are a paediatric nurse and talking about a child in this way. Almost victim blaming.
Have you actually watched Noel, the Big wet wipe. I'm most certainly not victim blaming. Sue, u read here can you confirm your husband is not a sex pest. Thank you. Ps I'm not standing up for you, breeding those frenchies,vile you're all a bunch of wrong uns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Have you actually watched Noel, the Big wet wipe. I'm most certainly not victim blaming. Sue, u read here can you confirm your husband is not a sex pest. Thank you. Ps I'm not standing up for you, breeding those frenchies,vile you're all a bunch of wrong uns.
Any adult who sleeps with a 12 or 13 year old is a sex pest. It's quite evident on the shows that Noel is quite controlling and has a temper, I wouldn't say hes a wet wipe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 35
At 13? Possibly 12? My kid of that age can’t always make up her mind what she wants for dinner. Do not blame a child for being groomed. Your opinion may be honest, but it’s very dangerous and wrong. I don’t care if Sue thought she knew what she wanted at 12/13, the fact remains and this is the part you are missing, she was a child for gods sake.
At 13? Possibly 12? My kid of that age can’t always make up her mind what she wants for dinner. Do not blame a child for being groomed. Your opinion may be honest, but it’s very dangerous and wrong. I don’t care if Sue thought she knew what she wanted at 12/13, the fact remains and this is the part you are missing, she was a child for gods sake.
Also, they read tattle all
Any adult who sleeps with a 12 or 13 year old is a sex pest. It's quite evident on the shows that Noel is quite controlling and has a temper, I wouldn't say hes a wet wipe.
I respect your comments
Any adult who sleeps with a 12 or 13 year old is a sex pest. It's quite evident on the shows that Noel is quite controlling and has a temper, I wouldn't say hes a wet wipe.
I
Any adult who sleeps with a 12 or 13 year old is a sex pest. It's quite evident on the shows that Noel is quite controlling and has a temper, I wouldn't say hes a wet wipe.
Also, they read tattle all

I respect your comments

I
 
It's worrying the amount of people on here lately openly blaming the 12/13 year old who was impregnated by an adult. I'm no fan of Sues, I don't like her and I make that plain. But look at any of the 12 year olds in your life and tell me that they'd really plot to trick a 17/18 year old boy into having sex with them and impregnating them. Look at their daughter Tillie, almost the age Sue was at the time, and tell me she'd essentially con a grown lad into sex. There is a massive difference and power imbalance between a 13/14 year old and a 17/18 year old. She was just out of primary school.

Noel is an idiot yes but don't feel sorry for him, he's proven to be very controlling and angry off camera. His own kids have said he has a short temper and can be very angry. He had a violent fight with his own son, he almost slipped up and hit one of his young sons in the last series for dancing next to him. He was not a poor soul tricked into sleeping with a young girl he'd known since she was 7. He consented to sex with a girl who had just hit puberty.

I don't doubt she was a willing participant but legally she could not consent. Noel said they were sleeping together for awhile before she got pregnant, probably since she was 11 or 12. As an adult even if a child begs you to sleep with them, you say NO. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I hope that if your 12yo daughter or patient told you she'd slept with an almost grown man you wouldn't blame her.

I hate to bring this up but I was the victim of a predator as a child and young teenager. Not saying that Sue's situation is the same (as she was likely willing) but the point still stands that kids can't consent and it breaks my heart to see people defend groomers and predators when I had to work so hard to get justice
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 70
Noel knew sue so knew her age. She looked it too. however I don’t think Noel is a risk to young girls now. He's got his victim .I’d love to hear his views on it now he’s got daughters. As for creepy chris oh hell yes I think he’s a risk to young girls now.

so Noel at exactly hat stage did you see sue in a sexual way, was it at 12, 10 or even 7
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I honestly can’t believe some of this. She was 13! This country is fucked if this is how people think. Jumped his ADULT bones? Fml!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 36
I honestly can’t believe some of this. She was 13! This country is fucked if this is how people think. Jumped his ADULT bones? Fml!
And we wonder why young girls keep abuse to themselves, because adults blame them , my mil actually said to me last week. girls who wear skirts have to take some responsibility. 🤬 told her what I thought and then said you raised 3 boys with that attitude.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 32
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
She was a child. She didn’t and couldn’t know what she wanted because she hadn’t reached the age of consent. Noel was an adult man. He knew her age therefore he should not have gone anywhere near her. I honestly can’t believe you’re a paediatric nurse with this attitude. Are you telling us that if a 13yo girl confided in you that she’d been a victim of statutory rape you‘d say that’s what she’d wanted?

Sue was a victim. Imo she‘s still a victim. She’s stuck at being 13 years old because that’s where her independent life ended. She’s been groomed to bang out child after child after child ever since. As soon as the media got interested and Noel realised there was money to be made he was never going to let this stop. When they were in Australia she said she didn’t want anymore but Noel said “we’ll see“. Phoebe was a baby then, so they‘ve had 3 more.

She might be a hard nosed braggy cow now, but she certainly didn’t deserve to be groomed and abused at 12/13.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 52
And we wonder why young girls keep abuse to themselves, because adults blame them , my mil actually said to me last week. girls who wear skirts have to take some responsibility. 🤬 told her what I thought and then said you raised 3 boys with that attitude.
Honestly it’s making me feel fecking sick. Don’t mind him being noncey but bleeping hate them for breeding dog WTF!!! I hope these people dont have children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
This is the Radford thread, can we leave Chris to the Ingham thread.

Noel 100% broke the law impregnating a 13 year old girl and even if Sue was seemingly consenting at 13 you cant consent legally.

In my opinion, Sue was a victim and has been trapped by it ever since, still think shes a crappy person but none the less, she was knocked up at 13, then 16and pretty much every year since with no way to escape the situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
Honestly it’s making me feel fecking sick. Don’t mind him being noncey but bleeping hate them for breeding dog WTF!!! I hope these people dont have children.
Oh but don't you know that the little girl was an evil plotter who tricked this poor helpless man into sleeping with her? She milked him of his unwilling seed just so she could endanger her body by having a child at 14, and then forced him to make 21 more with her, giving her no chance at a life of her own outside the home when she's constantly pregnant or caring for a baby. Poor darling Noel, bless his cotton socks, he should report her.

Seriously I've no time for Sue but I have no patience for people who defend ponces. I doubt she knew how her reproductive system worked enough to plan a pregnancy (it's not like she could google it like you can now) and anyway Noel should have used protection (or better yet not sleep with a bloody kid). This is why young girls and boys don't report their sexual abuse often enough, because they're blamed or told that they must have enjoyed it.

Anyway, did anyone see Sophie post Ophelia and mention Millie in her story? I wouldn't be surprised if Sophie and Chloe took Millie's side in all this. I don't like Millie but I want to see her succeed, partially for her childrens sake and partially to piss off Sue 😂 She's the gobbiest meanest one but that means she won't take any crap, which is working in her favour now. I keep picturing how Sue will react when Millie finally officially announces. Probably a fake happy story pretending everything is all fine and dandy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
This has made me feel sick.
In your ‘honest and educated opinion’ you feel that a 13 year old jumped his virgin bones.
What bleeping planet are you on?
I couldn’t give a monkeys how educated you are. You are wrong. On multiple levels.
I hope you’re never in a position of care for children.
I hope a child never, ever has to come to you to tell you they were raped. For you to somehow make it their fault.
Honestly, oh my god. Cannot believe what I’ve just read.
I really don’t like Sue either, but even I can see it’s pretty clear that she would’ve turned out different if she had been able to focus on her studies rather than having a baby.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
Fair enough. But where is proof Noel is still chasing after young girls, texting them, telling them to drop towels etc or as you say ect.I want proof if he's a wrong un. In my, very humble, but to be very honest educated opinion, he's more than a bit wet and it would have been her jumping on his virgin bones to be impregnated. She's not as daft as makes out and knows exactly what she wanted.
As everyone else has said, he got a 13 year old pregnant (who he was possibly first sleeping with when she was even younger than this). He was 17, above the age of consent. She was not. Whether you think she wanted it or not, that is statutory rape as she was not legally old enough to consent. There's your 'proof' that he's a wrong'un.

I don't think there's ever been a doubt that Sue verbally consented at the time. Perhaps she did even initiate it at the time? We'll never know. But that is not enough to make it ok when she was underage and legally not old enough to consent. He was the adult, he should have known he had to say no.

It's irrelevant whether Noel is still a threat to young girls now. Personally I don't believe he he is, as he's shown no obvious interest or concerning behaviour towards young girls since. He's got his victim, he's still controlling her, he doesn't need another one. However, that doesn't take away the fact that, historically, he is guilty of statutory rape.

Suggesting the victim of statutory rape was asking for it and is therefore at fault for an adult taking advantage of them is beyond low.

A 20 year old with 2 kids isn’t shocking. Her mother started when she was 13, at least Mille was of decent age. Her baby seems happy enough. I don’t like her but that’s not to say she won’t be a good mum to both of her kids.
Where did I say it was 'shocking'? Or suggest she won't be a good mum? Your comments don't relate to what I said at all, did you mean to quote me?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 9
My theory is that they are in Prague, walker stalker was asking for recommendations for ice skating in Prague a couple of weeks ago. Maybe its a join holiday as they have done in the past.
They went on a plane so its not Disney.

And Prague is full of low price IVF clinics with very few rules and regs on ages & numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.