I cannot even imagine how many glasses of “leg opener” cocktail is required to be just semi conscious enough to make it through special cuddles with him just to conceive the boy child.My ex (aka iron filing spray-on hair) used to do the same during passionate moments. I'd grab his hair, he'd rush to brush it forwards again. Kind of killed the moment.
Apologies for TMI
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
<cough> turkey baster <cough>
I reckon he’d be the sort to scream out woohooooooooo and the whole thing would take less than 30 seconds including foreplay
.
Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?
Oh my days I’ve just watched it, those eyebrows on top of those sunglasses just look ridiculousLazy doesn`t give a dam ,so long as they`ve content for their lame vlogs! Also ,whilst we`re talking about filming ,i`m surprised lazy didn`t grab herself a larger pair of sunspecs!Those eyebrows!!
Just looks about 50 and acts about 15!
besides by now her behind will be well and truly stuck to that sun lounger!
surely with the money they’ve saved on the begged hotel she could afford to have something done with them, they are shocking!
Do you work for Levi’s?
And those poor unsuspecting holiday makers behind her letting it all hang out, as others have said that’s not fair could she not just have sat at a different angle to protect their privacy?! 
I'm not sure about the US but in the UK we have had many prosecutions arising for historical abuse.
From what I understand, if there's sufficient evidence for the CPS then a prosecution can go ahead.
Your ex AKA Spray on iron filings head needs his own thread, I’m loving the updates!My ex (aka iron filing spray-on hair) used to do the same during passionate moments. I'd grab his hair, he'd rush to brush it forwards again. Kind of killed the moment.
Apologies for TMI
I think so. Before they made their Insta private they said 'see you tomorrow' or something similar in a post.
On the plus side, it's nice to see the children having someone to have fun with. Makes a change from hanging around with their parents.
I thought Florida criminal statute for sexual misdemeanours was until the victim turned 18 however the good news is the clock is effectively stopped on that statute time whilst he’s not in the state.
Effectively he’s back to day 1 without statute protection the second he sets foot in Florida. He has to have spent a continuous 12 months in Florida, without leaving before statute limitations may be considered.
Harassment is more of a misdemeanour however the penalties would apply to the country he was in. There’s no civil statute on that as far as I know. Contacting hotels and other places isn’t harrassment in itself, if it’s deemed a public interest matter.
A well positioned parasol would block out other people at the pool when filming Sarah.And those poor unsuspecting holiday makers behind her letting it all hang out, as others have said that’s not fair could she not just have sat at a different angle to protect their privacy?!
Easier to blind 12 year olds with 'very lot difficult' editing science than to get up off your arse and move an object though isn't it.
he could still go but mud sticks and he would be constantly looking over his shoulder, as FFTMC says we have had prosecutions going back years , I personally think if he does it once he will do it again except next time I hope the girl reports it in the USA (Im really hoping im wrong about a next time but its Chris Ingham we are talking about),
Is the Harassment you stated here just for Florida or is reporting in Europe considered harassment do you know??
That bald witch is an ex for a reason. Don't even get me started on him - he doesn't need a thread, he needs a dedicated forum for his various transgressions.Your ex AKA Spray on iron filings head needs his own thread, I’m loving the updates!
I loved her say ‘a very lot’ then you could see the penny drop when she realized where she’d read it...a very lot though the professional she is she proceeded to take the credit for noticing his bad grammar, like hers his any better. Hi Sarah, please sort your background out to avoid compromising your fellow guests privacy oh and pretty pretty please get those bloody brows sorted out!
though the professional she is she proceeded to take the credit for noticing his bad grammar, like hers his any better. Hi Sarah, please sort your background out to avoid compromising your fellow guests privacy oh and pretty pretty please get those bloody brows sorted out!I can actually smell it and imagine the sticky stains it’d leave on your hands. Creepy deffo uses something like this is put my house on it x
Last edited:
Harassment is one of those in the eye of the beholder type arrangements but making truthful statements as a matter of public interest respectfully and as appropriate isn’t deemed deliberately harassing or malicious. I’m assuming the same applies throughout most parts of Europe. He’d have to prove any malicious intent or reward first
I think in the Florida situation it’s more likely they will just deny entry as both he and the victim are uk citizens on tourist visas at the time. Too hard to prosecute.
Precedent was set in Australia, the feds don’t act without instruction and they don’t search phones and laptops on entry unless they’ve got court authority. There’s no way Interpol didn’t tip of the Aust Fed Police about his activity’s and they executed a lawful search whilst he was detained on arrival. He could’ve easily been booted out back to Bradford on suspicion alone.
Last edited:
Thanks for clarifying Ellerious- I’m not a lawyer. I had assumed that’s why they were told not to admit anything and wait out the limitation period. I am pleased that Chris will still be very concerned and worried about arriving at the US immigration the next time he goes to Florida. And as for the harassment - I just don’t want them to profit off (at our expense or from naive companies giving them freebies and then getting a backlash ) of Chris’ grossly inappropriate dealings with vulnerable teens.
I also think he will not be able to help himself and that it will happen again.
yes thankyou for clearing that up it makes interesting reading
He’s on someone’s radar .. he’s going to struggle with immigration particularly in the Commonwealth & Asian countries such as Thailand. He doesn’t seem to realise he’s possibly potentially flagged as a predator and was possiblydenied initial entry in to Oz as he may have been held to see if he planned to use it as a base to fly in and out of Asian countries on child sex junkets
I’m only speculating but child junkets and trafficking is a big destination lure in Asia
Last edited:
First of all, apologies that I don't know how to do screenshots.
There's an insta story on nothingbutsassyinghams that starts with For all the hate of me "filming through a fence"
Also if you look at the questions, someone has asked for an opinion about Chris. Makes for interesting reading.
There's an insta story on nothingbutsassyinghams that starts with For all the hate of me "filming through a fence"
Also if you look at the questions, someone has asked for an opinion about Chris. Makes for interesting reading.
Last edited:
Surely with all the people they have in the background, a few must have objected...so do they blur those people? I don’t watch the vlogs regularly so don’t know how often they do blur people out. You can’t just cut scenes with those who don’t want to be filmed if they are vital to the Inghams ‘plot’...or do the just film those scenes again? Hmmh
- Status