To me it sounded like she almost said something then turned it into "our". I wonder what part of the sentence she's referring to when she says she nearly said the name.
To me it sounded like she almost said something then turned it into "our". I wonder what part of the sentence she's referring to when she says she nearly said the name.It sounded like our
I couldn't either, I did try my best but just couldn't hear it.No sorry couldn't make her out saying O at all
Our 34 week giveaway will be a ahem basket of children’s socks and vests and weekRe the giveaway: why do they keep assumimg their viewers are poor and why wouldn't they pick something that is applicable to everyone?
I know everyone's pregnancy belly is different but how is there any way that's only a 33 week belly for a single baby? That looks around the 38 week mark. Cue "early labour" hysteria and people falling for it. Sorry to those who get annoyed with conspiracy theories on here but that's just what it looks like.
The Inghams are like an infection to anyone who does business with them. It's pretty sad because smaller companies like this photographer, the lady who made the travel books and the driving instructor are probably blinded by their lies and think that the association will work well for them.More comments on the Facebook post...
View attachment 5149View attachment 5150View attachment 5151View attachment 5152
‘No situation’ delusional woman who thinks her fans are stupid with no ability to make informed decisions. The arrogance of them both is the thing that makes me the most angry. If it doesn’t support our shitty failing brand... it never happened ?
Sarah clearly still in denial.
She knows full well that he’s guilty. What a bitch!!
Bringing her children up on a bed of lies is disgusting !
Also if there was “no situation” then they would have been all too happy to address the allegations as responsible adults on their main channel immediately and not run off to their hideaway cabin in the woods.‘No situation’ delusional woman who thinks her fans are stupid with no ability to make informed decisions. The arrogance of them both is the thing that makes me the most angry. If it doesn’t support our shitty failing brand... it never happened ?
The post is still there for me but all the 'negative' comments are gone.The photographer deleted that post, but left up another with the link to the video. How moronic are the fans for saying “wouldn’t the police have arrested him”, we’ve literally told you why they didn’t. Doesn’t mean it’s not morally wrong. Also, don’t give a shit if we “ruined” it for Sarah, she and her husband have ruined some vulnerable girls lives (including their own daughters).
The woman should have honestly just deleted & ignored it, removing the comment section if necessary instead of replying because then there wouldn’t have been any backlash on her for “defending” him. It is sad how even grown adults don’t seem to understand how the law works & just because something is not “arrestable” (not sure that’s even a real word but) doesn’t make it at the very least morally wrong and doesn’t mean it’s false.. the sheer volumes of people speaking out, regardless now of age - all with incredibly similar stories and the way in which it was said about - speaks volumes in the fact that there would be absolutely no reason for people come forward if it wasn’t true..?More comments on the Facebook post...
View attachment 5149View attachment 5150View attachment 5151View attachment 5152
Definitely buying views. Oh well less money to spend on holidays and to spend on tat.Coincidentally another jump of 30k views just within the last half hour on social blade. Same as this time last night...
I thought that, maybe as its to do with baby so they can ask for things.. Maybe because they read here and know this baby is a money machine and it has back fired so buying views to pretend it is getting interest, or lastly maybe more people genuinely viewed to look at Sarah look laughable and to see what she really looked like rather than photo shopped during that photo session.Looks like they may have bought some views on their latest vlog!
It seems very strange how some vlogs struggle to make 70/80k and this one is over 100k in the same amount of time!
You’re right, Sarah is far from innocent! If anything she is worse as she has continually supported her creepy cheating husband, mocked and help bully the victims and put her children at risk which is unacceptable IMHO.It annoys me that people on there are still saying Sarah is innocent, she may not have been involved initially but she has been very involved in covering it up and getting her family to troll the girls and people speaking about it. Sarah is up to her neck in “the situation” and social services need to take a damn good look at why she lets her kids in stay in that environment with a sexual predator who targeted girls only a few years older than Sarah’s eldest daughter (and creepy has been very creepy with a few posts about her ?)
I think you could be right. They’re probably buying views on the baby related vlogs to look like people seem interested.I thought that, maybe as its to do with baby so they can ask for things.. Maybe because they read here and know this baby is a money machine and it has back fired so buying views to pretend it is getting interest, or lastly maybe more people genuinely viewed to look at Sarah look laughable and to see what she really looked like rather than photo shopped during that photo session.
I wouldn't wash it first as it's brand new so is fine to wear straight away. I never wash any new clothes before wearing them. Am I gross then? ? ?Just watched the vlog. Who would buy underwear and wear it straight away without washing it first? That’s so gross. I could never do that. Why???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?