Sorry guys I’ve been away so on a long catch up. The idea that he has access to Isabelle’s IG and DM’s is absolutely horrific! He is likely in contact with countless young vulnerable girls opening up to what they think is Isabelle about all manner of things, boys, Mental health, periods, arguments with family etc and they think they are talking to a teenage girl!!!!!
At the VERY LEAST an auto reply msg should respond to the first message sent with ‘this account is not exclusively controlled by Isabelle so your message may be answered by other members of the family/team please be aware.
You can tell he’s got his confidence back by his IG activity alone!
I’m not sure I can see the victim in Sarah, some co-dependency yes but not victim, as was pointed out in the black hoodie video she was controlling that. If she has lots of nefarious family members (1 brother in sex offenders prison, 1 struggling (and I do mean that with absolute kindness) with addiction and homelessness then her moral compass is quite possibly all off, who knows how her Dad treated her Mum? We know he buggered off had a whole family thenreturned, lots of trauma could have happened in her young life to make all of Chris’s actions normal, normal for her.
As I’ve bored on about before anyway they’re a brand that’s all she’s protecting, her brand and her income, the victims can ‘do one’ as I can imagine her saying.
Her accent is her pretending to be much more better spoken than she actually is so the little slip ups back to ‘rough arse estate’ explain the discrepancies ?