She will stand in the queues for primark but not for Clark’s “etc etc” to get her toddlers feet measured.
Talk about sort your priorities out!
She will stand in the queues for primark but not for Clark’s “etc etc” to get her toddlers feet measured.Can someone tell me why Sarah dresses like a 16 year old ? Oh wait up I think we all know whyshe is so weird . Also get your kids feet measured , Jaces feet were hanging out of them sandles and couldn’t walk in them properly . Measuring is free and places are open now .....
I’ve said it before (and I know it’s terrible comparing kids) you cannot compare that shell of a girl to the likes of Kaci from DVG etc. Not one of those girls has a role model, they aren’t being taught to be strong and independent woman. They are being shown to settle for a Gollum and be happy with it. Sarah really has let them down, they are going to go through life looking to men to guide them. The one male ‘role model’As always, my heart goes out to Isabelle. She wears clothes that are so unflattering, I think its because she doesn't have many, if any, peers to mix with and only has lazy's dreadful style influence. Those clothes she had on today were awful, truly awful, the trousers were too short, the trainers were naf and the top was the sort that you may wear for a proper forest dog walk, under a jacket.
It's sad as they, supposedly, have the money for decent items, but even if they buy cheap, she could still look good, she is a pretty girl, but that's all being hidden under awful styles and unstyled, greasy hair.
Another example of neglect, and its very sad.
Bearing in mind that these family vloggers have a largely young and impressionable audience, I do think it's important to call them out when their actions are questionable.As much as I can’t stand the Inghams, aren’t we past shaming people leaving their houses?
I think it still the same car,they had two extra seats fitted in the bootI have not watched the vlog but do they have a new car. Esme was in the boot with her legs up to her chest so how can they buy stuff from IKEA and fit it in that car
They can't have taken over the new house officially as they would have needed to pay for it prior to getting keys etc. and they won't be able to pay for it until the money at least for their old house is paid so are they trying to kid that they own 2 properties at the moment and the buyers for their house must be daft to continue to wait for the exchange date personally I would just purchase another house and forget their existsBefore they were saying they had multiple sofas delivered to the new house, have taken box’s up to the new house but a new king size bed is getting delivered to the current house where they are sticking in the garage.
Sounds like the builder is stopping them getting anymore delivered there.
Where did they find these very very good friends Stacy and Terry?? They have never been mentioned before now they are the long lost bffs!!
Contracts for the new house can't be exchanged until the buyers of their house sign their contract as Lazy and Creepy will not have the funds to pay for the new house until this has been done and the builder would not want them putting any of their items in the way of completing the house in time for them to moveL
They say Pants for trousers where iam from
originally and that's North West .it maybe a regional thing .
On right move its still showing as subject to contract (minghams current house ) is this normal when they are saying the buyers are renting etc ???? All very suspicious.
But one of the main reasons that the infection rate is low (relatively speaking) is that we're only just easing out of lockdown restrictions! If we don't want to revert back to tighter lockdown measures then we have to exercise a bit of restraint and common sense.
So many people are yet to be vaccinated and we don't have herd immunity. Just because you are legally allowed to visit places it does not mean that you should traipse your family out every day for non essential reasons. I am certain that Boris, Whitty, Van Tam & co did not intend for whole families to use IKEA as a fun day out or visit multiple shops in one day picking up clothing for a child who has not even been born yet and already seems to have plenty.
I feel so sorry for shop workers who have to go to work and put themselves at risk (because there IS still risk) to cater to the whims of people who go out just to aimlessly browse, for something to do, and shop for shitty vlog content (most of which will probably go back for refunds), touching everything in sight and not wearing masks properly.
They Minghams do not need to be shopping every single day and don't need to go out en masse. To me they are incredibly selfish. They've been given an inch and are taking a dirty great mile, in the same way that they apparently met someone in a motorway service station when socialising indoors was forbidden. Their blatant disregard for others and for rules put in place to protect others makes me sick.
Their shopping habits have nothing to do with social/physical interaction tho , its just two fingers up to those of us who have stuck by the rules and haven't shopped every bloody day during a pandemicRates are low due to lockdown and our highly effective vaccination roll-out, which has been proven to work as there hasn't been any significant spike coming out of Easter, which would have been expected otherwise.
The Ingham of course, as usual don't do things in moderation, and I agree, there's absolutely no need to be running around multiple shops every single day, but thats solely down to their very visible shopping addiction- i think they're pretty isolated in that sense.
My point was just that we really need to move away from constant shaming of people who like to be out and about meeting up with others, shopping, enjoying themselves and getting back to some sort of normality. I'm not the most sociable of people, so generally speaking i'm fine not jumping at the opportunity to hit the shops and pubs. However, I can appreciate that there's many others who crave social/ physical interaction.
The Inghams are really just an extreme case, as usual.
No-one would be shaming them if they had obeyed the rules and this was the first time they had been to non essential shops. No-one would be berating them for mixing socially. The problem is Sarah has been out shopping non essentially non stop. They are not meeting up with friends and gathering outdoors or in the garden. They have ignored lockdown rules since they arrived back to the U.K last year. They didn't even obey quarantine rules FFS.Rates are low due to lockdown and our highly effective vaccination roll-out, which has been proven to work as there hasn't been any significant spike coming out of Easter, which would have been expected otherwise.
The Ingham of course, as usual don't do things in moderation, and I agree, there's absolutely no need to be running around multiple shops every single day, but thats solely down to their very visible shopping addiction- i think they're pretty isolated in that sense.
My point was just that we really need to move away from constant shaming of people who like to be out and about meeting up with others, shopping, enjoying themselves and getting back to some sort of normality. I'm not the most sociable of people, so generally speaking i'm fine not jumping at the opportunity to hit the shops and pubs. However, I can appreciate that there's many others who crave social/ physical interaction.
The Inghams are really just an extreme case, as usual.
Is it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.As much as I can’t stand the Inghams, aren’t we past shaming people leaving their houses? I don’t get the anxiety people are still perpetuating about covid when the infection rate is barely even worth talking about anymore. It’s not irresponsible to go out shopping as a family, meet outside with others etc. You say you don’t care restrictions have been lifted, that’s good for you, but there’s a hell of a lot of people who are very grateful that they have.
I’m talking generally here, after reading your comments and others referring to the “global pandemic”, going on here in the U.K. ...
ThisIs it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.
P.S. Dear Moderators, apologies in advance if this looks like I'm telling people what they can or can't say. I don't think it is but if that's how it comes across then I'll accept that strike because I can't just sit back and say nothing. Also apologies for derailing the thread but again, too much has happened to just sit back and ignore this. I don't meant it as a personal attack either but he laughing emoticon was just a step too far.
completely agree. It’s about behaving responsibly isn’t it? I met my brother in a pub garden yesterday so I’m not doing nothing - I’m enjoying the relaxation of lockdown. But I’m not flouncing around multiple places coming into contact with loads of people. They could actually be responsible couldn’t they and order the lat flow tests and blog doing them “it’s not nice but worth it to know we’re not spreading a deadly disease, the more people do this the more free we can all be” etcIs it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.
P.S. Dear Moderators, apologies in advance if this looks like I'm telling people what they can or can't say. I don't think it is but if that's how it comes across then I'll accept that strike because I can't just sit back and say nothing. Also apologies for derailing the thread but again, too much has happened to just sit back and ignore this. I don't meant it as a personal attack either but he laughing emoticon was just a step too far.
So true, they could be inadvertently be spreading the virus and they wouldn’t really care because they need to create a vlog.completely agree. It’s about behaving responsibly isn’t it? I met my brother in a pub garden yesterday so I’m not doing nothing - I’m enjoying the relaxation of lockdown. But I’m not flouncing around multiple places coming into contact with loads of people. They could actually be responsible couldn’t they and order the lat flow tests and blog doing them “it’s not nice but worth it to know we’re not spreading a deadly disease, the more people do this the more free we can all be” etc
Sat waiting for 5 to see the new house
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?