engagement (sorry, conversation).
Yep! There’s defs some cognitive dissonance over what influencing is? Like maybe replace the word old for not in stock as realistically that’s what most of her audience will be after - clickable links to go shop. There are a few accounts in ~environmental Twitter~ that do shopping your wardrobe/styling content that she could, but those people don’t work as influencers/on Instagram so can do it. When you’re paid by brands/aff link cash you just have to lean into the fact you will always be pushing your audience to buy, and buy new. That’s your job spec?!
Ick, the bent empty looking handbag with leopard print shoes…I’d say happy to help but…. so now they’re ‘old’ rather than old, she’s paying lip service over the semantics but still not really getting it. They are just your clothes ffs. But hey it’s all an opportunity for
And that coat is a prime example of trend chasing if I ever saw one.
Certainly not a ‘chic’ look that bag, it looks ridiculous, she needs to put something into it so it doesn’t have that squashed look - she’s not using her styling skills here.
Agreed and they’re online people so have to acknowledge that consumers are being more environmentally/socially conscious about volume and quality of consumption, and also inflation being so high/utilities rises people either can’t or don’t want to spend as much money. Which is fine if you’re a normal gal on Insta but if your end goal is to get your audience to convert you’re a) fucked and b) very dishonest if you participate in those convos as if getting people to spend money isn’t in your personal best interest. This obviously doesn’t only apply to AS!
Such a rookie error not to fill the bag - how could she not have noticed!
Back to it! Yeah back to forgetting to disclose your ads properly Alex
This is an #ad
That’s Alex for you!
