Pete was right for what he always said about Craig, a face for radio, and a voice for silent films.Yeah, this travel agency isn’t gonna be around much longer nor will they have money to fund the useless podcast which is not informative not friendly not fun and not engaging. Hannah is pretty solid but has no direction since Craig and Ryno are so awful at their job.
Don't you remember? They "can't wait" to tell their side of the story.God willing every single one of them goes bankrupt over this. Silence is compliance. They all waked around holier than though pushing political agendas when it benefited them, all the while ignoring the abuses Pete committed. May it all burn down
Their side is they didn't care as long as the free stuff was flowing. I'm sure they will all have amazing futures.Don't you remember? They "can't wait" to tell their side of the story.
Pete mentioned in a Patreon solo show quite some time ago (yes, I was once a subscriber) that they had entertained the idea of selling Dreams when some entity made an inquiry, but ultimately he and John (and presumably the silent partner) thought the offer was too low. I am laughing knowing Pete was already sinking the ship via his gambling pursuits. Wonder what John thinks now - with $1M in AmEx debt looming. Whatever that other company was, they dodged a bullet in not picking up this operation!... Them talking hurts the value of Dreams Unlimited Travel and if that happens, John can't get what he thinks he is "owed" on a sale and go crusing for the rest of his life.
It’s poetic F’n Justice.
Let’s say they manage to sell for $5M = $1.65 apiece among the three owners.
(Maybe they could've demanded a higher selling price before Pete took a big steamy public shit on the brand name, but not now).
After taxes, Pete walks with $1.08 million.
After AMEX gets its share = $218,000.
Let’s conservatively add another $50,000 in legal fees, and Pete is left with $165,000, also known as two months of online gaming losses in the Werner Media accounting system, or six months of Virgina Slims.
Ever wonder why his fiancé jumped out the bedroom window and sequestered himself in Boston?
Wonder no more: Pete barely has enough left to pay off Walter’s house, let alone to continue playing sugar daddy to vulnerable young men.
But honestly, who will buy this dumpster fire? Anyone who performs a modicum of due diligence will run for the hills before writing a seven-figure check to these three obese Gucci-clad SNL characters bumping into walls and doorways on their electric scooters. The remaining managing partner, John, has proven to be a reckless owner willing to put his company and employees in jeopardy by turning a blind eye to the clear and visible patterns of employee abuse - sexual and otherwise. Who would want to risk their hard-earned capital to acquire a company with such a troubling past, which continues to rear its head to this day? It’s natural to assume more revelations (and possible lawsuits) are still on the horizon.
ANY potential buyer would demand a huge discount from such a sad and tarnished brand. (BTW, Pete didn't just cost DU $900,000 in gambling debt. His deplorable behavior cost it millions by downgrading the company's value in the eyes of a potential buyer).
But there is no buyer, and there never will be. There is just sinking revenue and mounting debt.
It’s not often Karma strikes back so perfectly, but it is truly satisfying when it does, right?
Pete and John are both despicable in their own ways, and it’s great to see them get what’s coming.
Which is nothing.
Burger King should have the smallest menu and least to screw up.
Burger King Taco Bell or Starbucks where do you see Ryno excelling?
Let’s conservatively add another $50,000 in legal fees, and Pete is left with $165,000, also known as two months of online gaming losses in the Werner Media accounting system, or six months of Virgina Slims.
DreamsElaine finished with 'Thanks for watching & happy cruising' but I read it as 'f*** off and I hope your boat sinks.' Her thin-skinned response putting the OP in her place was so typical of many I've read from seething lower-managers who have spent a whole afternoon on a rebuttal email. Then the OP says 'I may have crossed the line' and 'Next time, if I feel something needs to be clarified, I won't make assumptions and just post the clarification without commentary. Keep up the great work on the show.' It is Elaine who should be apologizing, she gave out incorrect information! Her response to the criticism was ' If we do not make something clear or misspeak on something, it is because we are humans and it happens.' Oh, that's OK then, what a very reassuring response from a professional travel agent. And bizarrely she blames the post-pandemic transition period for not being familiar with the product she sells. Didn't that recovery start about three years ago? Any company still blaming COVID-19 for anything is probably not one that you should do business with.Well, when you have this kind of response from the lead lazy motherfucker:
DIS Unlimited Podcast
And then there are these steaming pile of shit responses to a perfectly honest criticism of further laziness on the part of the crack DUT cruise line team:
Small nitpick and correction for the DCL Podcast
Basically, it's "We're really good at our job so it's not our fault that we put out shitty, outdated information. It's Disney's fault, plus you morons should know when we say "buffet", we don't REALLY mean "buffet" in the traditional sense and context that every other breathing human being uses".
The stupid twat, DreamsElaine, goes on a serious whine-fest in post #20. Craig weighs in in post #18, explaining why he is consistently useless across several of their online offerings.
Exactly this. They've also resumed practice of deleting threads and punishing those who dare question a moderator.It is ingrained in the company's and channel's culture. You are there to worship at their altar and if you don't agree with them, they will tell you not to watch.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?