Is there a super industrial option?
Is there a super industrial option?The trouble is Pekey which size do I get normal View attachment 2956061 or industrial View attachment 2956065
Yes, the chapel doesn't actually look that good.Some serious photoshopping going on there!
Get that big one Jackie but buy two or three ...... the Hags and Hell Hounds will need it !!!The trouble is Pekey which size do I get normalor industrial
Looks new. So much for her lie at the Garden Show that she had no coats to wear so had to purchase a $1,000 coat at the show. Good ole pathological liar Fanny. So predictable.What on earth is she wearing in the photos with Ratso? Looks like another new robe! Or is it another expensive coat bought at Chelsea; it could well be.
She has driven it but she likes to be chauffeured around like the old lady in the movie Driving Miss Daisy. She wants her servants to do everything for her. The LieLande version is Driving the Smelly Greedy Grifter.As I rarely watch the lying bitch and her nonce sidekick something tattlers mentioned tweaked my little grey brain cells...
The Porsche. It's evident that they own it. And in all probability "the gift" for Thrush to keep the bodies hidden. But I seem to recall some lovely tattler(s) saying that only Thrush drives it now. Why is that? Does Despicable fanny never drive, not been seen driving for a while... ? Has she been caught by the pesky speed cameras? (that sprout like forests all over la Hexagon!). Or stopped on a drink drive?
It just got me to thinking...
...Cue Despicable fanny driving said Porsche and coming clean about owning it.
I would have thought building the chicken house and sheering the sheep would have been in Grant’s slave skillset. I recall Grant went shopping with Fanny the last time he was there and helped pick out a fancy hen house. Finally, it seems the bloom is off the rose and Grant is waking up and coming to his senses! Here’s hoping!I don't understand the whole chicken thing anyway. It starts with the question: why chickens? Just for a few eggs? Sad that the previous chickens are gone (whatever happened), but it would have made more sense to end the chicken theme there. But I get it, chickens = content.
And I don't understand why such a botched accommodation for the chickens is being made again. A night quarters and a run with a net and if someone is in the garden they are allowed to go into the original run. I look at how Marie (who else is out of the question) constantly lets the chickens out, supervises them and locks them up again. The internet is full of ingenious and above all safe and practical accommodation for chickens. Carolina Coops, for example, has so many examples and instructions on her YT channel, Ellen Degeneres has a fantastic chicken run. Possibilities upon possibilities and instead they are now messing around again in the usual manner. The only thing they care about is when they can start designing the interior, choosing wallpaper and decorating.
But this is typical Land of Lies - neither the sheep (already shorn?), nor the peacocks and certainly not Ruby have species-appropriate accommodation. What's the point of having animals if you neglect them so much?
Amaury and Natti were sitting along side Pav at the dinner table. He appears to have returned to the dump. But for how long is anyone's guess.has now been called in to build a chicken fort so Stephanie can pack it full of new chickens for content since she does not do any restoration at the dump and Amaury has fled the premises for the past several months.
Who thinks that both jumpers will only be used for felting after the first wash and tumble dry.Snorty purchased 2 lambswool sweaters - pink and mauve ($289.00 each), 2 pairs of high waisted trousers - blue and beige ($398.00 each, and 1 new lightweight collarless shirt ($277.00 each). Snorty purchased $1,700 in clothes at the Carrier Company UK shop. Here Marie - enjoy using this $103.00 flower tote that stays at the shitoo after you leave.
It doesn’t matter if the markup is 1X or 1000X, fast fashion is still garbage. It’s going to be interesting to see what effect France’s new fast fashion law has. Most would say Carriere is fine fashion. It’s not. None of what Tit for Tat buys and wears is designer. It is ready to wear at best. The basic fashion levels are Haute Couture, Designer, Ready to Wear and Fast Fashion. I would argue there’s a tier above them all, Bespoke. Only the client will ever have that particular design. Also you could squeeze Made to Order in between Designer and RTW. The Nightmare Twins haven’t a clue on how to judge quality, they are simply label readers. Both are absolutely unaware of what best suits their bodies in color, cut or textile. They think themselves so stylish when they’re nothing more than embarrassing. Stephony and PeePee are low class examples of the emperor’s new clothes.I don't understand Fanny at all- it was like a combination of a terrible belated birthday present and "Here's something to make your work more efficient- you're welcome!" while they spent gobs of money on their own shopping sprees, all while moaning how much the chateau renovations cost. How about a thoughtful gift for a change? Maybe FRK would have liked a lovely cashmere jumper as well (not from the Carrier Company UK) to keep warm in the hovel that lacks heat. I mean, she was still wearing her Christmas jumper a few months ago (which Fanny mocked her for) to stay warm. Sadness.
While I don't think Dingo Grunt and FRK are anything more than friends, I do believe they are kind to one another. Of course, Fanny tried to create drama about showing the note FRK left him that the books could go into the boxes to lead the "sheeple" to believe something untoward is going on to deflect the valid questions her viewers are asking about her holidays and shopping sprees . Fanny is a mean girl.
Ironically, I purchased a grey cashmere jumper from Sam's Club (the US big box store) for $30 almost 20 years ago. Member's Mark brand, and yes, I am a bad person who has washed it on the delicate cycle in the washing machine and put it in the dryer on low. It has been my basic beyatch travel companion for years and years- I wear it on airplanes, I wear it in the Winter, I wear it everywhere. Classic, timeless, and it STILL is in good nick. It has held up far better than any other expensive cashmere jumper I have ever purchased. Snorts' $300 jumper is new, and already looks like it needs to be binned.
Stephanie Jarvis is definitely a label whore.It doesn’t matter if the markup is 1X or 1000X, fast fashion is still garbage. It’s going to be interesting to see what effect France’s new fast fashion law has. Most would say Carriere is fine fashion. It’s not. None of what Tit for Tat buys and wears is designer. It is ready to wear at best. The basic fashion levels are Haute Couture, Designer, Ready to Wear and Fast Fashion. I would argue there’s a tier above them all, Bespoke. Only the client will ever have that particular design. Also you could squeeze Made to Order in between Designer and RTW. The Nightmare Twins haven’t a clue on how to judge quality, they are simply label readers. Both are absolutely unaware of what best suits their bodies in color, cut or textile. They think themselves so stylish when they’re nothing more than embarrassing. Stephony and PeePee are low class examples of the emperor’s new clothes.
I actually like the Napoleon coat, but it sure does have a lot of buttons. Too many for Fanny, as she only has one side of the collar buttoned down.Thanks for the new thread @ComtesseRose.
All I have to add to the numerous call-outs on the stupidly expensive coat is that it looks like a Panto costume. Dandini is in the house. Fucking hell. What an embarrassment.
Cornwall is an oasis for gardeners. My favourite is Caerhays but I am biased as it is owned by family.Oh no she had better just have been spouting off as is her want. I spend a lot of my time in various gardens in Cornwall (having retired it is one of my favourite places to go to) and the last thing I want is to see or hear her spoiling the enjoyment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?