- Chateau de LaLande is the Best Little Whorehouse In France
Fanny only had eyes for the Fleuries!
All I know, because all people are willing to say at the moment, is that the disagreement is serious and not yet resolved. I am sure that when we start speculating about it here, Stephanie will do her best to show "nothing is wrong" scenes about how much they all really love each other, but the cracks are undeniably visible. Some of the actors and reactors in the ongoing quarrel will not be as easy to push aside as FRK or Selmar and are bound to speak eventually, if not in public than at least within the entourage. Also, the "fun" Easter weekend with old "friends" bears another problem for Stephanie Jarvis, as many of these fools now got to see the damage she's been doing to the place with their own eyes, after being "locked out" for years due to the Covid restrictions. They also got to experience the annoying pressure of living with that pink iPhone in everybody's faces 24/7 (and those of the other YTvloggers). They will probably all say how wonderfully exciting the weekend was (like the Fleuries already did on their IG) but the truer stories always follow with some delay.Now there's ashow waiting to happen.
(Unless Stephanie part with him on good terms...)
Don't tell me it's all crumbling really fast now...
But is it intertwined with the disagreement Lakrin had with Stephanie...?
Petherick has to be sidelined now even if he was available to come he wouldn't have been invited. Since wallpapergate he's tainted. Dick & Angel Strawbridge are big players for Channel 4 - they're prime time TV. The split by them from the spin off DIY programmes is deliberate. So Fanny would be daft to let Petherick into her filming as Ch4 wouldn't want to annoy them - they are described as "jewels in the Channel 4 crown".
. Now he's just a 'bunny out of water'
Joos Bos, a Dutch friend of Stephanie Jarvis (no, not just any friend but one with benefits, are you paying attention, Snorting Cameltoe?) and Nicolas Gasquet, a local French guy who came along with Tess Hoffman, who considers him to be a brother, much like the brother from another mother from Stephanie Jarvis.
He didn't, she's old news and he came with another of his older but unrequited love interest Tess Hoffman, who he fancied way before he started dating Stephanie Jarvis but who he later lost to Adam Guettel. She might be warming up to him again now that Adam Guettel has called it quits. After all, Mason has serious money and having serious money is what those ladies attracts most.
To me, this post from Marie is a sign she’s in the midst of recovering from narcissistic abuse. Feeling lost, lack of confidence, unhappy, unhealthy. It can take a long time to recover. I once had a therapist tell me sometimes it takes the same amount of time to recover from the effects of the narcissist as the person was exposed to the narc abuse. After my experience with a narc, I don’t think I’ll ever be the same again. In some ways I guess that’s good because now I can recognize the signals so I don’t let it repeat.
The only truth is that, other than Clara who isn't going to say, none of us know what happened. Some are convinced that Dan is having an affair with Sabine, some cite Dana (God forbid
), others have mentioned Cat and some suspect Fanny herself. Now either Dan is a very busy boy and he's been having it off with all of them or we are just speculating until the truth is may be revealed. Annalise may have met someone else ( perhaps that's what some of Dan's recent music choices indicate) or one or both of them may have just decided that they are no longer happy or fulfilled in the relationship. Personally, that would still be my theory. Everyone seems equally convinced that they are correct.Whatever the cause, Dan doesn't certainly look either happy or well whereas Annalise seems to be be flourishing. Is this because she finds the breakup a relief or because she has started a new relationship? Maybe one day the truth will out but I don' t think this is likely to be anytime soon.
Oh I agree. We men like the chase. If a woman has charisma & confidence, it is a bonus if she does not show you the goods but dresses for her self. It makes you have to try harder to imagine what lies beneath. Too much on display is advertising in your face. A gorgeous woman does not need to do that, and she does not want to. And, let me add something that I have said before. It does not matter if breasts sag, bottoms have dimples, scars, veins, imperfections...if your attitude is cool and you respect yourself, if you come across as confident and in control, men will feel honoured to get you naked. What is Not hot is implants, injections, long fake lashes, hair extensions etc. I am sorry, it is just not nice. Be yourself, no apologies, - dolls are not for grown up men. I love beautiful women, but personality always win. You would laugh if you had heard the arguments in my home,- I have a wife that cannot accept that she is growing older.When I was around 20 - decades ago. I worked for a company that had 2 totally separate branches of the same company. Every Christmas the company held a combined works dinner/party, really lovely events. And, might I add, all paid for by the partners too.
After attending his first function, my direct boss - we had a fabulous honest/respectful "working relationship" and I loved working with him.
He was unattached/early 30s. However, I was attached so nothing untoward was going on.
He came back into the office and actually said that he had enjoyed the evening but felt that the "girls" from the other office were displaying a little too much flesh but that the women from our office, although more covered up, were far more appealing for having done so.
To my mind, sex appeal isn't about putting everything out on display, it is primarily all about, "the suggestion of" what may lie beneath.
Would be interested to know what male members here feel about that statement please as it obviously made an impression on me. TIA.
Pretty hard to look like your winning in life if you have to charge your friends to come and visit.
You are just such a hypocrite, Kathy. You love to rant about what you think is important to rant about, but are afraid to be burnt as a Tattler. You are a Tattler, Kathy, as we all know you read here and if you had the stomach for it would write here too. You are usually one of the first to comment on new anti-shittoo-channels that pop-up on YT. It gave you some status and some people started to expect certain things of you that you clearly feel shame about. Get over it. You once called our @MojoDublin an arse. Go look in the mirror and see if you can talk again.Just saw Kathy's latest rant.
All I wil say. I'm feeling my oats all day every day.
I have to tread with care here as you know my objective not to talk about anything relating to Dan & Annalise breaking up their marriage, but what I can say without being to literal is that everything at the shittoo is always smoke and mirrors when Stephanie Jarvis is involved and nobody who considers him or herself part of that crowd has a genuine bone in their body. Generally speaking, if you feel the need to ask me a question like this, you probably know the answer already.
Yes, but like I explained: the lovely time has nothing to do with the location or the main characters of her soap opera. If I can, I try to avoid being part of the shenanigans and stay the hell away from the excesses that are at the base of Stephanies parties.
