How many times can they keep going back to court?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
We desparately need to get MH help and support into schools. Most of the people picking up the children who are suffering are TAs and SEN teachers who have no specialist training. We can refer but the list for counselling/treatment are so long, the parents and children turn to a friendly familiar face but we are not trained and are concerned about doing more harm then good. It breaks my heart. xx
It's not actually that confusing. When you lose a case you can ask the court that heard it whether can appeal. Mostly IME they're going to say no, because why would a judge say 'here's what I think, but appeal me because I might be wrong'. Obviously they think they are right, so they're rarely going to think their decision should be appealed (except in some circumstances). But if that was the only way to appeal the court would be holding themselves accountable, which isn't fair. So today, the court this case was heard in have said we don't think there is a point of appeal here, but to ensure fairness and accountability etc, the SC can also hear what an appeal might look like and decide whether it has merit to be heard in full. And while it is a bit lengthy/seems a bit daft it is fairer that way.
CAMHS didn't really exist when I was a teenager, you basically had to be extremely unwell to be seen by anyone, and that was if you were able to discuss what was going on. Things like Childline seemed to be for very serious issues like sexual abuse and I always had the impression you weren't supposed to call them otherwise. I remember when I was 15 some research students handed out forms to our form to fill out about depression in teenagers, and I filled it out really honestly hoping someone would see it and I could talk to somebody, but nobody ever contacted me.
I have thought someone on that page may have a personal issue with hollie beyond thinking what she's dragged archie through is awful. It seems more than Internet stranger
Well yes and they may have additional supporting evidence to submit
I’ve been suicidal since I was a teenager and have been in therapy on and off for 15 years. So to answer your question, yes.
The amount of porn young children are accessing, I'm talking the ages of 11, 12, 13...is appalling. Schools have banned phones etc but the kids still access it and show it around their friends. It is truly disgusting. It needs to stop but I have no idea what the solution is. Its the same with graphic violence sadly, it's being 'normalised' and they don't see what is wrong with it. x
If she doesn't,she will regret it.She will soon be back in her house
No offence taken.There is information out there,especially when they went to court,stating Archie’s condition etc.
I highly doubt any qc would want to touch this case pro bono.
I remember messaging Childline a few times and they really didn't give me any good advice
They're probably powerless but is it really that hard to create a few leaflets on self-help tips (that aren't just taking a bath, I'm thinking more along therapy exercises that you could do yourself) and how to seek help if you want to try? I don't want to go into specifics but that would have been far more helpful than the 'advice' given to me
Why? It's a great one to do pro bono. High profile, in the most senior courts, lots of inter-jurisdictional issues, parent who is almost certainly not going to complain or sue you.
I really hope that when the time comes, she can actually let him go with dignity and not cause a huge scene. Although I fear a police presence will be necessary for the protection of the medical staff. I wouldn’t like to be the person that flicks the switch. Poor sweet boy.
His final days should have been spent with his parents sat with, talking to him and giving him love. Instead his legacy will be that the last days and hours of his short life were filled with hate and vitriol. Hollie seems to spend more time engaging with strangers online, whipping up a shitstorm rather than caring for her son.
His final days should have been spent with his parents sat with, talking to him and giving him love. Instead his legacy will be that the last days and hours of his short life were filled with hate and vitriol. Hollie seems to spend more time engaging with strangers online, whipping up a shitstorm rather than caring for her son.
I don't think its criminal but definitely ethically and morally wrong.. you'd think.
The problem is nobody wants to be the person who tells a grieving mother straight not that she would listen. People fear for their jobs and getting sued hopefully a judge or consultant approaching retirement will give her both barrels. She's ridiculous, thankfully a huge overwhelming majority aren't army supporters in comments on social media.
D'ya reckon Jeremy Kyle will challenge her? He's into cav baiting isn't he? He'll probably go down the head tilting, mushy sentimental route though, lest she takes his head off.
100% this. Right out of the gates everyone on that mawkish Facebook group was telling her she was doing the right thing. Fast forward to the last few weeks, even though it was clear the judges in the appeal court thought that her and her barrister were talking out of their arses, nobody wanted to be "that guy" to tell her to just stop wasting everyone's time and do the right thing. Unfortunately I can't see Kyle being any different.
Yes exactly. She needs to seek guidance and support from other mothers who have lived experience of this, not randoms on Facebook who will misguide and misinform, which she feeds into.
I’m not in the group on Facebook, however I imagine that most people in there are grief tourists who love a bandwagon.
I have also
- Status