It's so detached from reality, I don't for a second believe it's real. Passing off someone's creative writing to suit a narrative as journalism is pretty low.DM article is full of inaccuracies. Feels really made up? like They’ve taken em sheldons comments an made up a story using them. I can’t see anyone speaking to the DM about using tattle
Does it mention the Jack thread?!The only cliché they don't seem to mention is Caroline flack. But they wouldn't go there as the tabloids used paps that would smash her windows, slash her tyres and generally harass at home in order to get a reaction. Like actual abuse and harassment.
It's like she's writing a poor screenplay with the imagery - talking about putting the kids to bed, pouring a glass of wine and opening her laptop to troll on tattle
It's all so clearly made up, I can't think there's more than a couple of regulars who post on both Mrs hinch and jack Monroe. So it's either one of those 2-3 people or all a figment of the "writers" imagination.
Whoever this Polly Dunbar is she should be very embarrassed. I wonder if in her head she thinks it's fine to invent this fictional character? Maybe she believes tattle is full of people like the one she's created (it isn't) so it sits fine with her moral compass?
Not really, this creative writer just picks the two most popular threads to weave inDoes it mention the Jack thread?!Would be brilliant news if it did tbh
I mean sad fishing on Twitter to the point where someone transfer you some of their *winter heating allowance* is pretty despicable Daily Mail xNot really, this creative writer just picks the two most popular threads to weave in
She thinks nothing of calling Mrs Hinch (real name Sophie Hinchliffe) a ‘sofa slug’ for posting pictures of herself sitting holding her baby, or the food writer Jack Monroe ‘despicable’.
Oh no someone called jack despicable! The horrific abuse, thanks for the morality check mail online
Daily Mail journalists should get both sides to a story. Sign up here and ask us all everything you want.Spotted this tucked away:
What makes a woman abuse a stranger online?
Joanna is a 40-something mother, wife, successful professional… and online troll. Polly Dunbar finds out what drives a supposedly nice middle-class person to such extremeswww.dailymail.co.uk
So annoying how you can’t seem to have a s opinion that goes against the grain now without being considered a trollSpotted this tucked away:
What makes a woman abuse a stranger online?
Joanna is a 40-something mother, wife, successful professional… and online troll. Polly Dunbar finds out what drives a supposedly nice middle-class person to such extremeswww.dailymail.co.uk
Why do people who question things have to be jealous. Why cant we just be people ( like we are) fed up of bull shit.So basically that article reads is: we are all jealous and that’s why we are here. Noted
She's hardly one to talk. Everything she says people do on here (which they don't) she has done others. Claiming to find out who people are through IP addresses which is impossible, saying she knows where they live and that they should be reported to the police. Doxxing people online because they gossiped about her. And attempting to contact people's employers to get them fired because they were gossiping about her online. She is an unhinged lunatic and shame on the media for giving her coverage.Who made this 'Em Sheldon' the poster girl for online trolling? I've never even heard of her before, is this a pathetic attempt of hers to gain notoriety online?
Also, she is a failing "influencer." She was in with InTheFrow, Carly Rowena, etc before. Then their careers took off and hers stagnated. All she does is post affiliate links and claim she is being trolled.She's hardly one to talk. Everything she says people do on here (which they don't) she has done others. Claiming to find out who people are through IP addresses which is impossible, saying she knows where they live and that they should be reported to the police. Doxxing people online because they gossiped about her. And attempting to contact people's employers to get them fired because they were gossiping about her online. She is an unhinged lunatic and shame on the media for giving her coverage.
Funny how they only ever mention comments out of context and never explore why people made themI mean sad fishing on Twitter to the point where someone transfer you some of their *winter heating allowance* is pretty despicable Daily Mail x
They can read the site, it speaks for itself. But they don't want to.Daily Mail journalists should get both sides to a story. Sign up here and ask us all everything you want.
And that we're bitter that they make money, despite us being successful professionals.So basically that article reads is: we are all jealous and that’s why we are here. Noted
Gives them something to virtue signalling over.Yet still influencers and bluetickers love it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?