Too much publicity - without the Martha Mystery there’s not much worth talking about.If the Martha situation was addressed people would actually shut up about it and Tan + Jim would be rid of all the everyday dm’s, comments and questions.
It would leave more space for favourite trousersToo much publicity - without the Martha Mystery there’s not much worth talking about.
To be fair, I'm sure their marriage breaking down and getting divorced was pretty traumatic and they still managed to release a statement. I don't understand why they can't do the same here and then ask for privacy. By not saying anything or even acknowledging the poor dog's existence they're just inviting more gossip and speculation, especially given that Tanya's career is so dead. In some sick way, I'm sure she's deliberately not mentioning it to ensure she still gets engagement on her channel.Hi everyone, I am new here and won’t be participating in all the dialogue, but I felt compelled to set the record straight as I’ve seen so many messages about Martha, and a lot seem to indicate you genuinely care about what happened to Martha.
I know for a fact that Martha is no longer alive, she had a terrible accident and it was not necessarily Tanya’s fault. Dachshunds are not the easiest of dogs to look after and from what I heard, it was just a horrible accident. I know this from someone who knows Tanya, it was apparently very traumatic and so I knew not to ask for more details, I don’t even think my friend knows the exact details, but Tanya was very “distraught” and so it’s just no longer spoken of because it’s very upsetting for all of them (Jim as well as Tanya I suspect). No doubt the true story will never be made public (or confirmed or denied) because there will be plenty of hate.
Unfortunately that’s all I can say. I don’t want to cause drama but it seems a lot of you really are concerned for Martha’s safety and I thought I could at least set the record straight.
Thanks
100% correctI don’t see why they would need to go into the finer details of why she died if she did though. It would be enough to say she passed. No one needs to know the exact circumstances so it wouldn’t be lying.
I would also say, as a pet owner, I think ‘negligence’ is a hard word. If Martha ate something she shouldn’t have or ran in front of a car because the gate was left open Tanya would still have my sympathies. Accidents aren’t always total negligence. I know many wonderful pet owners that have lost theirs due to an accident of exactly that kind. Any long term dog owner that claims there hasn’t been a circumstance that could have injured their dog would be lying imo.
Agreed, maybe I am really naive here but I truly believe Tanya loved Martha and I really don’t feel like she would want her to come to any harm. An accident is probably really hard to talk about, if that is true the guilt must be unreal.I don’t see why they would need to go into the finer details of why she died if she did though. It would be enough to say she passed. No one needs to know the exact circumstances so it wouldn’t be lying.
I would also say, as a pet owner, I think ‘negligence’ is a hard word. If Martha ate something she shouldn’t have or ran in front of a car because the gate was left open Tanya would still have my sympathies. Accidents aren’t always total negligence. I know many wonderful pet owners that have lost theirs due to an accident of exactly that kind. Any long term dog owner that claims there hasn’t been a circumstance that could have injured their dog would be lying imo.
This is so fake lol.Hi everyone, I am new here and won’t be participating in all the dialogue, but I felt compelled to set the record straight as I’ve seen so many messages about Martha, and a lot seem to indicate you genuinely care about what happened to Martha.
I know for a fact that Martha is no longer alive, she had a terrible accident and it was not necessarily Tanya’s fault. Dachshunds are not the easiest of dogs to look after and from what I heard, it was just a horrible accident. I know this from someone who knows Tanya, it was apparently very traumatic and so I knew not to ask for more details, I don’t even think my friend knows the exact details, but Tanya was very “distraught” and so it’s just no longer spoken of because it’s very upsetting for all of them (Jim as well as Tanya I suspect). No doubt the true story will never be made public (or confirmed or denied) because there will be plenty of hate.
Unfortunately that’s all I can say. I don’t want to cause drama but it seems a lot of you really are concerned for Martha’s safety and I thought I could at least set the record straight.
Thanks
I tend to play along with these things, but in reality take them with a pinch of salt. That said, I've always thought Martha died - and that her death was an accident. I never believed the 'shelter theory.' You have to be a pretty cold person to do something like that. Despite her new persona, I don't get those vibes from Tanya. It always seemed to me that both Tanya & Jim loved Martha.I can’t be the only one who doesn’t believe a word from these new “insiders” who suddenly created accounts and started spilling the tea“A friend of my sister”, “someone I know”, etc...all that sounds so fake
100% agree. My indoor predigree cat once slipped out of an open door when a friend came over and we didn’t realise he was missing until the morning - sadly he’d been hit by a car. He spent 6 weeks at vets and in cage rest at home and then died on Boxing Day of a blood clot. The vets were closed on this day and we didn’t realise how ill he was - we had to travel to a different emergency vets and got stuck behind a tractor on the way as it was country roads and we could have left the house much much sooner but I was faffing with my makeup.@littlepup You're 100% right about that. Negligence was definitely a very strong word to use. An accidental "got out the gate" or "a care giver let her out the door while Tan was away" wouldn't be negligence and you're right. The guilt would be unreal. The more I think about it, I think you're right. She was probably away and a pet sitter let her out and she was hurt somehow. That would make much more sense. Especially with Sarah's "ask the person who had custody" comments.