I did...I was actually very polite. No response.
I did...I was actually very polite. No response.This
Has anyone tried to contact her on Instagram to discuss her ... statement?
Careful, she gets turned on when you mention her. There’ll be endless stories about how she’s thrilled the “tattle trolls” mentioned her
Who even IS this jumped up prick?
Orbyn has met Susie probably 2-3 times. I’m sure of this. Not prepared to give myself away further.
She creams herself because she met Nigella once and they talk on Twitter. It’s sad.
I agree actually- the entire speech was badly worded, which makes me think she did write it herself. She uses the wrong word often.Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the “apology” or lack thereof is fully of shit.
but at the beginning when she said “it’s not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not important” etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise it’s not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but that’s how I heard it.
She also meant multitude rather than dichotomy and facilitate was the wrong word. she definitely wrote it herself. the stern pauses too... what a car crashI agree actually- the entire speech was badly worded, which makes me think she did write it herself. She uses the wrong word often.
I don’t think she meant ‘whether or not’ she sent the text, but regardless off / inspite of.
Also when she said she can’t ‘facilitate’ killing her self I think she meant she won’t have those kind of comments - again, wrongly worded.
Either way, hope she never gets any ‘insta’ work again.
Candice and Susie are not friends - if they’ve ever met it’s been at a panel or some other shit. Candice freely declares non of these insta huns are her mates.
Get what you’re saying, and it’s sort of how I heard it too...but the lack of apology can not be denied. The re-framing of herself as victim cannot be ignored either. Agh. I want to forgive and forget but it’s hard. I’m still following as now once I unfollow I can’t see the content afterwards!Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the “apology” or lack thereof is fully of shit.
but at the beginning when she said “it’s not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not important” etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise it’s not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but that’s how I heard it.
Same, which shows how smart it was to go private as it’s definitely going to help retain her follower numbers.I’m still following as now once I unfollow I can’t see the content afterwards!
Agreed.Same, which shows how smart it was to go private as it’s definitely going to help retain her follower numbers.
I honestly think she just wants to make sure she gets her magazine wedding deal then she'll fade away.Agreed.
Her followers are down by 2K.
Surely it would be unwise for her to continue posting or ‘blogging/vlogging’ her life as she has supposedly received threats directed at wher and, horrifyingly, her children?
I see what you're saying but the fact that she then goes on to attempt to give the context (6 or 7 years ago, said in jest, steeped in sarcasm, not as controversial) is the issue for me as it shows she is trying to excuse her actions, even if she is indeed saying the opposite! That's why it's such a joke to me.Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the “apology” or lack thereof is fully of shit.
but at the beginning when she said “it’s not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not important” etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise it’s not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but that’s how I heard it.
She should just be accepting she’s effed up MASSIVELY and with that comes the loss of lucrative deals, like Hello/OK magazine paying for your wedding (the wedding you could easily afford yourself, no doubt)I honestly think she just wants to make sure she gets her magazine wedding deal then she'll fade away.
We all know how it looks is important to her.
Que Susie's windswept hair and sultry veneers face.
Greg looking constipated and like chandler bing.
It'll all be very stylish, sophisticated and dull.
She's so vain. So fickle and has no substance.
She should just be accepting she’s effed up MASSIVELY and with that comes the loss of lucrative deals, like Hello/OK magazine paying for your wedding (the wedding you could easily afford yourself, no doubt)
Who knows, maybe she’ll try to redeem herself by offering her wedding photos to the mag in return for a donation to charity? And pigs might fly...
I wonder if anyone has contacted the magazines?
So she’s is active again on stories??hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
She’s sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....
hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
She’s sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....
I think she’s posted a story to test the waters with her followers.hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
She’s sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?