Absolutely. Since the producers happily invite ringers on to the show every single year, their idea of "what Strictly is all about" clearly differs to Shirley! Not to harp on the Danny Mac thing for the millionth time but there was the same issue in his year with Len applauding Ore for never having danced before and him being "what Strictly is all about" as if it was Danny's fault that the show approached him and asked him to take part.I think the producers need to decide and clarify "what Strictly is all about" and make sure the judges are on the same page with whatever that may be.
Definitely.I really do think Vito and Fleur have a true and lasting friendship.
Shirley is very inconsistent imo. She lashed Eddie one week, with something she could have phrased very differently. There was almost the sound of a sharp intake of breath in the audience, at the time. And then handed him a wholly undeserved 10 the following week.That's a fair point and I do agree with Shirley. I do tend to agree with her on most things I just am not a fan of her delivery!! I think she could be less soul destroying with her criticism, she's a tougher judge than Craig when's she's not happy with something
I do agree that Layton and Nigel aren't really what Strictly are about. I get that, I really do, but I am happy to have them in the competition right up until the finals because I like watching them dance!! I don't think ringers should win, but without them the early stages of the show would be unwatchable, let's be honest
Imagine a full series filled with only Les Dennis's and Nikita Kanda performances 🫣
I get the impression Ellie is a grounded likeable young Lady, not the type to be full of herself, I heard her say on This Morning she spent yesterday in bed then went out for a meal with her familyHonestly if I was Ellie I'd have spent all yesterday sleeping. She's probably knackered and needs a few days to recover and process things.