It really is. It’s actually very very sad she’s accepted tickets from a young boy. Genuinely don’t know how she thinks that a flex. It’s just embarrassingAye true, That's worse
Kitten heelsWonder what she will wear?
he is tagged in her video where she is dry humping her camera standHow do yous know a boy bought them for her? I can’t see any that lol!
And what’s the chances she wear’s any of the sunglasses in Ibiza??? NONE
In guessing either something too young for her or something my granny would pick for me to wear, paired with her horrific thigh high boots or her manky maddens!Wonder what she will wear?
Was maybe messaging Churchy, can't see it being 'girls' defo bats for the other side.She made a point of saying she wasn’t talking about her exhusband but was referring to a recent ex. She wasn’t expanding (well her waist is), elaborate is probably a better term to useon what he had done but I’m almost certain there was mention of messaging girls or not shutting them down when they were messaging him.
is Rylan partial to a wee pizza crunch as wellWas maybe messaging Churchy, can't see it being 'girls' defo bats for the other side.
Maybe but we need to stop giving him contentis Rylan partial to a wee pizza crunch as well
So it’s fine for her to contact peoples work because she doesn’t like their opinion of her but people can’t contact brands because her ads are misleading with filters/misinformation, contact social services because she knowingly drugged her son for an advert?View attachment 2957951
Always on insta and not TT
Let’s face it , if this was true she wouldn’t be posting it and warning the person ! She would just let the police deal with it
IF and that’s a big IF charges are pressed by putting this on Insta she has jeopardised the whole if any case. Firstly before she knows this person has contacted brands etc then there has definitely been a GDPR breach somewhere along the lines. Companies who pass people information on are subject to million pound fines. So, in essence the person whose data has been breached can counter sue both Steph and the companies involved. Secondly, cases like this aren’t really classed as harassment as contacting third parties is an act of free will. Thirdly, unless the person has physically or threatened to pyshically harm Steph then it’s usually a civil case. It’s a bit like ringing the Polis on Karen at work because she called someone a bitch and heard they were sniffing coke off the CEO’s back at the Christmas partyView attachment 2957951
Always on insta and not TT
Let’s face it , if this was true she wouldn’t be posting it and warning the person ! She would just let the police deal with it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?