her poor foof ain’t had time to recoverSo Rose was six months old when she conceived. Is that right?
Yes, Rose would have been 6 months.So Rose was six months old when she conceived. Is that right?
My ex sister-in-law got pregnant and found out at six months gone via a scan. She had taken tests at 4, 5 and 6 months because her periods really thinned out but didn't stop. All were negative.Well, she's wrong lol - a pregnancy test doesn't stop working just because you have high hCG.
Edit: Ooo, she's right. Apparently it's called the hook effect.
"The hook effect in pregnancy is a false-negative result. It is a phenomenon that can occur in both blood and urine pregnancy tests. Women may get a negative test result on a urine or blood pregnancy test despite being pregnant."
As we like to say on the Hinch thread, these two are two cheeks of the same arse. There are differences between them, but still... As bad as each other.I don’t know who’s the bigger idiot at this point - her or Hinch. When it gets to the point of hiding your nails so people can’t work out the timeline, you are just a pathetic loser. Babies are always a joy but it’s sad when they are used as cash cows.
ummm?? what a weird thing to say, it’s a baby? you’re very odd for thinking anything elseOf all the photos he could have posted he chose this one. It just makes me a little uncomfortable.
6 or 7, I can’t maths well. But that’s about the same time she stopped breastfeeding right? Soo many people think you have to have a period first to get pregnant, and stopping feeding restarts some people’s cycles - I reckon that’s how she’s got caught out and it’s a ‘surprise’ baby.So Rose was six months old when she conceived. Is that right?
She's so fuckin salty, if she didn't know on her wedding day that she was pregnant when she had a massive bump and her wedding dress no longer fit her than she's just admitted to being impossibly stupid.The comments are hilarious