Stacey Solomon #5

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The ease of the lockdown doesn’t mean the threat of the virus is lowered, is just means the ICU’s have space for you now.
I personally think she’s taking an unnecessary risk by taking him on a shopping trip which is not essential. Regardless of what Boris says, surely common sense would tell you that isn’t the best idea?
I’m sure she’ll be back on her page tomorrow with her usual ‘Susan’ stories, where she thinks she’s being hilarious but all she’s doing is showing that she can’t take opinions and feedback on the chin.
And if she doesn’t want those opinions or feedback, maybe she should think twice about shoving a camera in her kids face 24/7 and broadcasting it to the general public.
Totally 👏🏽 I’m in shock people are trying to get back to Normal And go tit shopping because they are allowed. Where’s the common sense!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Then like I said, be angry at the govt for opening these shops again in the face of this virus.
I’m not angry, I get why they’ve done it. The economy needs to be kickstarted again.
The government aren’t in charge of people’s common sense. That’s for us to use as individuals
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Then like I said, be angry at the govt for opening these shops again in the face of this virus.
They are doing it for the economy, not for idiots like Stacey to take her baby and potentially put her family in danger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
They are doing it for the economy, not for idiots like Stacey to take her baby and potentially put her family in danger.
I don’t understand what you’re saying, if the shops are open and people like Stacey don’t go shopping, it’ll do eff all for the economy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
No problem with Stacey going shopping, but why take her baby?
Playing devils advocate, he’s at less risk than she is. She doesn’t appear to meet anyone without social distancing and none of her family are at high risk(as far as I know), so Stacey and Rex going shopping are exactly the type of people who the govt are telling to go? To help the economy?

Like I said before, I’m at higher risk from being diabetic so I won’t be going shopping or anywhere else but work for a very long time but the govt are trying to get the economy going again so I can’t blame Stacey for taking Rex shopping. Just an opinion, I’m sure some feel different.[/QUOTE]
 
Then like I said, be angry at the govt for opening these shops again in the face of this virus.
I'm bleeping furious at this government!!

Doesn't stop me having an opinion on Solomon taking her child unnecessarily to shops though.
No-one stated that she was going against government guidelines, or that she was wrong, just putting my opinion on her shopping trip on here! Selfish of her, in my opinion, and all done because she works with Primark and needed to show us her 'haul'
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 9
Playing devils advocate, he’s at less risk than she is. She doesn’t appear to meet anyone without social distancing and none of her family are at high risk(as far as I know), so Stacey and Rex going shopping are exactly the type of people who the govt are telling to go? To help the economy?

Like I said before, I’m at higher risk from being diabetic so I won’t be going shopping or anywhere else but work for a very long time but the govt are trying to get the economy going again so I can’t blame Stacey for taking Rex shopping. Just an opinion, I’m sure some feel different.
[/QUOTE]
Listen I cba to come on here and argue with people, absolutely fine for Stacey to go shopping but no need to take Rex. Yes he’s at less risk from becoming ill but he could carry the disease and pass it on to everyone at home without even knowing he had it. A 1 year old baby is not going to help get the economy going again. We have different opinions so let’s leave it at that.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 8
Listen I cba to come on here and argue with people, absolutely fine for Stacey to go shopping but no need to take Rex. Yes he’s at less risk from becoming ill but he could carry the disease and pass it on to everyone at home without even knowing he had it. A 1 year old baby is not going to help get the economy going again. We have different opinions so let’s leave it at that.
[/QUOTE]

Alright then🤷‍♀️
 
Listen I cba to come on here and argue with people, absolutely fine for Stacey to go shopping but no need to take Rex. Yes he’s at less risk from becoming ill but he could carry the disease and pass it on to everyone at home without even knowing he had it. A 1 year old baby is not going to help get the economy going again. We have different opinions so let’s leave it at that.
Alright then🤷‍♀️
[/QUOTE]
Surely you understand that when you have an opinion regarding the virus someone is most likely going to disagree. I respect your opinion but it doesn’t mean I have to agree with it
 
Alright then🤷‍♀️
Surely you understand that when you have an opinion regarding the virus someone is most likely going to disagree. I respect your opinion but it doesn’t mean I have to agree with it
[/QUOTE]

Lol! Absolutely, I agreed to disagree? People are very sensitive on here when someone has a different opinion.
 
Baby led weaning you just give them everything together you don’t do a pudding as such. I would give this to my little girl no problem, it all goes down the same hole
I used to give it all on the same plate too until she started eating the strawberries first & not touching anyt
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Playing devils advocate, he’s at less risk than she is. She doesn’t appear to meet anyone without social distancing and none of her family are at high risk(as far as I know), so Stacey and Rex going shopping are exactly the type of people who the govt are telling to go? To help the economy?

Like I said before, I’m at higher risk from being diabetic so I won’t be going shopping or anywhere else but work for a very long time but the govt are trying to get the economy going again so I can’t blame Stacey for taking Rex shopping. Just an opinion, I’m sure some feel different.
[/QUOTE]
She could have left him at home and still helped the economy.

She used someone else's make up when she went to work the other day she may be a silent carrier and carried it to her children = risk.

Rex could be a silent carrier and pass it on to someone = risk.

I'm also diabetic with heart & lung disease & elderly so high risk. I wish that people would do whatever they can to help stop the spread of this virus thats all!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
She could have left him at home and still helped the economy.

She used someone else's make up when she went to work the other day she may be a silent carrier and carried it to her children = risk.

Rex could be a silent carrier and pass it on to someone = risk.

I'm also diabetic with heart & lung disease & elderly so high risk. I wish that people would do whatever they can to help stop the spread of this virus thats all!
[/QUOTE]

From Saturday I will be going into other peoples houses (as part of my job!) you could say I’m putting my family and other people at risk but I have to work.

it’s all about your own opinions and wether you think it’s safe for YOUR family, there are people all around me who are ignoring all the social distancing rules, having people in their houses, parties etc, I think Stacey taking Rex shopping is low down on the list of people putting everyone at risk!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
She could have left him at home and still helped the economy.

She used someone else's make up when she went to work the other day she may be a silent carrier and carried it to her children = risk.

Rex could be a silent carrier and pass it on to someone = risk.

I'm also diabetic with heart & lung disease & elderly so high risk. I wish that people would do whatever they can to help stop the spread of this virus thats all!
From Saturday I will be going into other peoples houses (as part of my job!) you could say I’m putting my family and other people at risk but I have to work.

it’s all about your own opinions and wether you think it’s safe for YOUR family, there are people all around me who are ignoring all the social distancing rules, having people in their houses, parties etc, I think Stacey taking Rex shopping is low down on the list of people putting everyone at risk!
[/QUOTE]
Just because it’s low down doesn’t make it right. I personally cannot understand why she would feel the need to take him but again I know that everyone has their own opinion which is fair enough 🤷🏻‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
🤷‍♀️ I don’t think anywhere on here that says this is a rubbishing thread, it’s under gossip so to me both good and bad things can be said. Maybe I’m wrong, I dunno. I don’t comment on her weird laugh and hygiene because both annoy me but the thing about taking her kid to Primark when govt regulations now say that’s ok, I thought it worthwhile pointing that out and then people get all butt hurt about a different opinion. It’s silly.


All I'm saying as soon as I have opinion being remotely nice someone says I didnt realise this was the rave thread. Cant have a good opinion 🙄

I cba arguing about going to shops etc people are going to go if they want to and we could all sit and argue thread after thread no one is going to back down either way so let's all move on and change the subject
 
Why open the shops if you’re not supposed to go? All shops are adhering to social distancing.

If you want to avoid the shops then that’s fine, but it’s also fine to go out if you want to. She’s following government guidance so she’s done absolutely nothing wrong.

Edited to add - the economy is on its absolute a so the more people are buying the better at the minute. The massive recession that’s about to happen will lead to more deaths than covid.
Maybe because we’re not sheep and don’t listen to government guidelines just because Cummings, Johnson et al are saying it’s okay, doesn’t mean all of us are going to go along with that 🤷🏻‍♀️

I, and many others, use our own risk assessments based on personal circumstance and gut feeling. Most cabinet ministers are hardly likely to be queuing at Tesco or needing to pick up their own prescriptions. So because the government say jump, I’m not going to ask how high
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Maybe because we’re not sheep and don’t listen to government guidelines just because Cummings, Johnson et al are saying it’s okay, doesn’t mean all of us are going to go along with that 🤷🏻‍♀️

I, and many others, use our own risk assessments based on personal circumstance and gut feeling. Most cabinet ministers are hardly likely to be queuing at Tesco or needing to pick up their own prescriptions. So because the government say jump, I’m not going to ask how high
So maybe Stacey has done her own risk assessment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.