But they prob won’t be as they’ll go on the seg unit with all the other onces and terrorists for their own protection! Prisons are totally over crowded, I would just exterminate them!
- Status
Whilst I agree to some extent, it opens up a really slippery road. We either spend a lot of money as they appeal every sentence even with undisputed evidence. Or we have a slip up, and someone dies who shouldn’t have, or you get a power mad Home Secretary who suddenly adds x crime on to the list, or y crime and then all of a sudden it becomes a free for all like in some countries and it’s your brother, sister, next door neighbour.
Not only that, it becomes a circus. We are in the age of social media and everything being a public display. The people who film when terrorists start, the people who do TikTok missing hunts, the people who go to a riot across the country about an issue they know nothing about will all want these things to be public, and there’s nothing dignified about death in anyway. And the death penalty loses it’s seriousness when it becomes a tv show and almost a reality show.
Oh, there are definitely HUGE government contracts given out to house migrants and others (for example homeless smackheads) in hotels and various other forms of housing. Britannia Hotels has a huge hand in this particular pie. Multiple large hotels owned by Britannia in a resort near me have been turned over to this business in whole or part over the past five years or so. It's great for the owners of Britannia, as it means they don't need to do ANY repairs or maintenance on their properties and let them go to rack and ruin as the 'guests' have no choice in their housing and the bill is paid before they even arrive. The bad reviews from actual paying guests matter nothing to them as they're at full capacity, paid at high rates, all year round.
There are plenty of slumlords who own multiple HMOs who benefit from the same deals.
Think this is in London but to be fair she looks well if she is 72 years old. Regardless of the rights or wrongs of her thinking the police arresting her isn’t a great look. Obviously if there is footage of her doing something illegal then fair enough but I doubt she could cause anyone much harm.
Its giving Pam from Gavin & Stacey
I wrote a post to say this and wasn’t sure how well people would take it but I’m glad it’s not just me
especially the ‘you what? are you joking? I’ve never been arrested in all my life.’ bit. 
Haha. Yeah, but they have really picked the smallest easiest target here. From the optics it doesn’t make them look good at all.
Reports are saying he's now been charged. Can anyone confirm how long he was held for without being charged? 48h?
They’ve charged him
Same.....It bothers me greatly that they can't name and shame the b because of his age
Yes he’s charged with 3 murders and 10 attempted murders/ possession of a bladed article.
Liverpool mags tomorrow.
Liverpool mags tomorrow.
18th birthday imminent
Once he turns 18 ( apparently very soon) he can be named unless the judge puts a gagging order on…Never heard of a 17 yr old referred to as a boy it’s usually youth.Same.....It bothers me greatly that they can't name and shame the b because of his age
Agent Provocateurs? These idiots rioting also enjoy supportive yet sexy underwear?That's the thing, I'm not trying to absolve these people of guilt but I think it's worth trying to understand how we ended up here rather than just blaming them for being idiots. I mean they are likebut there is more going on. Agent provocateurs etc.
Oh good Lord, what an image!
these girls deserve justice without his defence claiming he hasn't had the right to a fair trial. reporting restrictions apply to social media tooType in --- on X
All info there
If she’s causing trouble , no matter the age, she deserves to be arrested. I don’t see the issue. This isn’t a make vs woman thing. Plenty of men have been arrested, it just hasn’t been on SM
ETA she may have been easier to restrain as she got up close. Men in the videos we are seeing are keeping a distance and throwing things.
Last edited:
And thats the thing. People share stuff on social media without thinking of the effects. It’s just like the news for things like this. But people don’t see it that way. Its like having a million newspapers.
But the same people sharing forget their new messiah shared crap all over social media and some perpetrators of CSE nearly walked free. He also got sued for spreading false info.
People need to be careful because this lad could walk.
not only that, given that we have already had a mosque attacked due to false info, is this information also true?? Or do we see some random family have their house burnt down because people share without thinking.
---
It might not be true….. the first lot of info about him wasn’t. I’m not defending him btw I just don’t want to see innocent people get harmed because of rumours, and someone who actually did this walk free from this crime because people feel a need to play detective.
Unsure why you're sharing a Lozza Fox post uncritically here, when he was one of the instigators of the riots, and now seems to be complaining about police treatment of the protesters? I do wonder what he means by "or this will get worse" because it sounds like a threat. OTOH I guess it's kind of interesting to click into the tweet, only to see people who presumably had nothing to say about, for example, the police pulling children out a house by force and manhandling them into a police van in Leeds, or the stomping of a suspect's head while he was tasered on the ground in Manchester, now complaining about police brutality. I suppose we must all draw our own conclusions.
we don’t know what time he was charged but it’s now more than 48hrs since he was arrested. Given they have only announced it this morning and he’s already due in court today it makes me wonder if they have delayed announcing the charge to try and limit the amount of people travelling to court to cause problems.
- Status