Yeah, like when he drove his kids for hours to a closed chip shop just so he could take it to a newspaper.
Simon Harris #7 Twagic
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Simon Harris Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
No newspaper is going to pick up on a dad endangering his children to post on social media.
It's not only yours and your children's life you put at risk fatty. It's the emergency services that shouldn't have to deal with idiots like you on the road .
There were weather warnings not to travel simple Si.
It's not only yours and your children's life you put at risk fatty. It's the emergency services that shouldn't have to deal with idiots like you on the road .
There were weather warnings not to travel simple Si.
Oh he can't comment on that. Adil is one of his good guys
Who’s he talking about now?! You’d really think someone so sensitive to any form of comment that isn’t up his a would stay off social media.
He's so bleeping self righteous isn't he? I used to just dislike him, but now I honestly hate the harmless bleep. Subtweet that, you large imbecile (I know it's not a tweet, but "sub-facebook status that" doesn't sound right haha)
Simon, newsflash. Everyone hates you and is slagging you off in public spaces. It’s called free speech.
Simon, u ok hun?
Vague booking like a 13yr old girl in the 00s.
"Stumble across it". Yeah right. Can imagine the furtive vanity searching going on 24/7.
He’s probably got google alerts set up against all his pseudonyms.
'I'll DM you Babes...'
---
Obviously not crossed his mind that they might have wanted him to see it!
This is precisely the sort of thing that has prompted years of sneering from large Boy Harris. Very often aimed at the working class and women in particular. The irony seems to be lost on the halfwits commenting underneath with “u ok hun”, and “sneks everywhere”, that large Boys original rant isn’t a parody.
But just like everything else when it comes to this bitter, malicious, vindictive hypocrite; it’s totally fine for him to do it, but not anybody else.
In another post, he’s having a self-righteous whinge at people targeting political figures and identifying individuals on social media. It can lead to real world consequences and he wants accountability “should the worst happen”, he pontificates.
Ah yes, of course. Because you’ve never targeted any political figures on social media ever, Simon. You were always so fair and balanced when you were attacking Lee Anderson and Farage with fundraisers, and writing tit satirical articles targeting Boris or Rees-Mogg. You would never have spent months on end mercilessly bullying and instigating pile-ons against commentators like Adam Brooks and Sophie Corcoran on a literal daily basis. No way!
“Context is so important!” he proclaims in the comment section. What he means by that is, “I’m allowed to do it and I’ll turn a blind eye to anyone else doing it as long as the target is someone I don’t like”.
God he’s such a disgusting human.
But just like everything else when it comes to this bitter, malicious, vindictive hypocrite; it’s totally fine for him to do it, but not anybody else.
In another post, he’s having a self-righteous whinge at people targeting political figures and identifying individuals on social media. It can lead to real world consequences and he wants accountability “should the worst happen”, he pontificates.
Ah yes, of course. Because you’ve never targeted any political figures on social media ever, Simon. You were always so fair and balanced when you were attacking Lee Anderson and Farage with fundraisers, and writing tit satirical articles targeting Boris or Rees-Mogg. You would never have spent months on end mercilessly bullying and instigating pile-ons against commentators like Adam Brooks and Sophie Corcoran on a literal daily basis. No way!
“Context is so important!” he proclaims in the comment section. What he means by that is, “I’m allowed to do it and I’ll turn a blind eye to anyone else doing it as long as the target is someone I don’t like”.
God he’s such a disgusting human.
I think this might be what he is upset by:
He moans about being "slagged off in a public space" and claims to have "stumbled upon" the criticism. But let’s unpack why this statement, much like his inflated public contracts, doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.
The critique posted by Jon Morter’s ex-wife was reposted by United in Kind, the very platform Kirsty's "crack team" of social media experts - including her favourite Simon, helped establish. Conveniently, Simon omits that United in Kind is now likely under the control of Jon, his former collaborator. Given their intertwined professional and personal histories, it’s disingenuous to suggest he "stumbled upon" this. Simon’s framing of this as a random encounter feels like a deliberate attempt to downplay his awareness of the controversy. His cryptic “I am the victim” post is designed to mislead his supporters, who likely remain unaware of these details.
And what is she criticizing? Simon’s receipt of nearly half a million pounds in public funds to manage social media for Essex County Council during the pandemic. This is alongside allegations of improper contracting practices, unchecked nepotism, and a disregard for fair pay and accountability. Instead of addressing these serious points, Simon’s response is classic deflection. Rather than engaging with the issues of inflated payments, stolen ideas, or mismanagement, he wants you to focus on his feelings—how "hurt" he is by people’s ingratitude.
This is classic victim framing: avoid accountability by making it about betrayal and your wounded pwide.
He moans about being "slagged off in a public space" and claims to have "stumbled upon" the criticism. But let’s unpack why this statement, much like his inflated public contracts, doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.
The critique posted by Jon Morter’s ex-wife was reposted by United in Kind, the very platform Kirsty's "crack team" of social media experts - including her favourite Simon, helped establish. Conveniently, Simon omits that United in Kind is now likely under the control of Jon, his former collaborator. Given their intertwined professional and personal histories, it’s disingenuous to suggest he "stumbled upon" this. Simon’s framing of this as a random encounter feels like a deliberate attempt to downplay his awareness of the controversy. His cryptic “I am the victim” post is designed to mislead his supporters, who likely remain unaware of these details.
And what is she criticizing? Simon’s receipt of nearly half a million pounds in public funds to manage social media for Essex County Council during the pandemic. This is alongside allegations of improper contracting practices, unchecked nepotism, and a disregard for fair pay and accountability. Instead of addressing these serious points, Simon’s response is classic deflection. Rather than engaging with the issues of inflated payments, stolen ideas, or mismanagement, he wants you to focus on his feelings—how "hurt" he is by people’s ingratitude.
This is classic victim framing: avoid accountability by making it about betrayal and your wounded pwide.
It keeps popping back up no matter how he tries to defend himself. Love that for him
how does having helped someone "a few years ago" negate that in the subsequent/same years you were ostensibly involved/complicit/adjacent (however directly or indirectly and however much control you had) in shafting someone close to them?
---
like my neighbour rescued a package off our doorstep containing a new telly box that we didn't ask to be delivered while we were on holiday, if they now decide that they want to throw rubbish over the garden fence, am I not allowed to be annoyed about it?
---
like my neighbour rescued a package off our doorstep containing a new telly box that we didn't ask to be delivered while we were on holiday, if they now decide that they want to throw rubbish over the garden fence, am I not allowed to be annoyed about it?
Last edited:
That's far from a slagging off, looks on the face of it to be a well researched and factually backed up statement on the situation as a whole!
Yup amd United in Kind does some pretty good work, my son now has social life thanks to the funding and support they provided to a group which to set up a social club for autistic adults. Fa5 more than anything Si has done.
Yeah, it’s a bit like consent, isn’t it? If someone consents in the past it doesn’t mean they’re still consenting now, you have to check. I would have thought Essex’s #1 large boy feminist would know that.
'Just snakes everywhere, hun'
Is it too early for thread title votes.
- Status