That is absolutely a genuine piece of Harris work. I’m old enough to remember when he first ran it. The stick he got didn’t stop him repeating it ad nauseam every Valentine’s Day for years.
Yes, that one councillor’s mention of “vanity stats” made me realise that he was quoting from here almost verbatim.Yes, seeing the downfall of Harris is a thing to behold.
I know this is a Simon Harris thread, but remember the rot goes deeper. We likely won't hear about Harris much any more, unless or until there is the involvement of the police and this is made public. Now, O'Callaghan and the cabal of individuals who she funded and her friendship with these and socialising with them needs to be constantly revisited - this forum has done a great job along with LG at getting it into the public domain and it now needs to be kept there and we can do a job in making sure it remains there. I heard certain things in that debate, mentioned by politicians, which seemed to be based on insights gained from reading what's be written here. But it is still being referred to as a "Simon Harris" story or to do with the pandemic, or to do with social media... when in fact the scandal is really about grifting from the public purse and wider than this.
Just a tit version of the Daily Mash. Which is a great description of the Daily Mash also.I remember thinking 'what kind of insufferable loser runs that site?' when the SNN posts started popping up years ago. Well, now I know.
This. Totally agree. I keep checking companies house to see if they’ve published the accounts that we’re all waiting for. I can’t see it happening. She’s between a rock and a hard place. Publish them and there will be hundreds of beady eyes poring over every detail, which is the last thing she wants. Or she carries on with her brilliant ostrich impression, lets it lapse and yet another company bites the dust without ever paying a penny in tax. This surely runs the risk of a full blown investigation into all her past and present business dealings.and then the company returns. I am calling it here that these will lapse, end up being late and then she'll close it down. And if that isn't a red flag deserving of HMRC investigation, I don't know what is.
But he totally owned the Tories and those fat gammons Barry and Keith and Clive when he "hacked" the Daily Mail by editing a tweet they embedded in an article!Simon was never funny. Thought he was an edgelord, just a sexist fat racist. The dailymash just copied the onion. Americas finest news source .
pure speculation, I've looked and never been able to find anything concrete (even not in relation to any of this)Was it just speculation that GFM has arrangements/kick backs with successful multi-fundraisers, or is that a real thing?
Guys, Nish Kumar has a really hard job. He bravely gets on stage in front of audiences who he is sure will agree 100% with him and says clever things like duck the tories.But he totally owned the Tories and those fat gammons Barry and Keith and Clive when he "hacked" the Daily Mail by editing a tweet they embedded in an article!
Daily Mash and Nish Kumar are clapter based dross that's as funny as stepping in an upturned plug.
The Daily Mash used to be really good, but I'm talking about 15 years ago here. Their "Daily alcohol limits not really working for us, say drinkers" was a masterpiece I still think of today. Their constant hit jobs on British Gas for being evil were also great. Somewhere along the line it just turned into another smug, middle-class outlet the same as a thousand others.But he totally owned the Tories and those fat gammons Barry and Keith and Clive when he "hacked" the Daily Mail by editing a tweet they embedded in an article!
Daily Mash and Nish Kumar are clapter based dross that's as funny as stepping in an upturned plug.