Simon Harris #5 Mr Harris, who was a popular figure on the internet

[MavisBeacon]

Kirsty Callaghan should be shitting herself. I bet every single procurement she’s been involved in is getting looked at.

This. I want Private Eye all over this tit. She's not just got her and her mates' snouts in the trough, they're all four trotters in as well.
It's annoying when private companies pay consultants silly money to deliver bullshit, but it's up to them to argue that they're delivering value for their shareholders. It's inexcusable when it's money from the public purse at a time of unprecedented tightened belts after 15 years of cuts. Absolute cunts, the lot of them.

 

[Fred Santos]

Like idiots, we forgot to do screen shots of O'Callaghan's 23.5 million in six months (or was it 235 million?) claim. Her twitter account is now no more. I am pretty sure she said they had "reached" that many people.

Well here is something still proudly posted on her linkedin (until that is cleansed) which repeats the same assertion but a little less equivocally.

I think they likely conflated "impressions" with "people", or at the very least allowed that confusion to remain uncontested.

If there is one lesson from this it is that if councils chose to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on anything they need to now what they are buying and they can be confident it was actually delivered or else unscrupulous vendors can do exactly what Harris seemed to know full well was possible from that youtube video first posted here but now picked up by LG and posted more widely. In the case of O'Callaghan, there was simply no way she could have monitored the work independently as she was pitching for work with the same actors via her company or otherwise socialising with them.

 

[Le Cochon Roux]

Like idiots, we forgot to do screen shots of O'Callaghan's 23.5 million in six months (or was it 235 million?) claim. Her twitter account is now no more. I am pretty sure she said they had "reached" that many people.

Well here is something still proudly posted on her linkedin (until that is cleansed) which repeats the same assertion but a little less equivocally.

View attachment 2739444

I think they likely conflated "impressions" with "people", or at the very least allowed that confusion to remain uncontested.

If there is one lesson from this it is that if councils chose to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on anything they need to now what they are buying and they can be confident it was actually delivered or else unscrupulous vendors can do exactly what Harris seemed to know full well was possible from that youtube video first posted here but now picked up by LG and posted more widely. In the case of O'Callaghan, there was simply no way she could have monitored the work independently as she was pitching for work with the same actors via her company or otherwise socialising with them.

By "conflated impressions with ppeople" do you mean they hammered F5 while furiously masturbating over their own alleged brilliance?

 

[CookieZippy]

Henry is still pretty busy sharing away on Facebook. He's shared one article about King Charles over 60 times alone. I love that one of the groups he shared to got this in reply.

 

[lilykestrel]

Henry is still pretty busy sharing away on Facebook. He's shared one article about King Charles over 60 times alone. I love that one of the groups he shared to got this in reply.


View attachment 2739679

also posted this

 

[CookieZippy]

Thank goodness the members of the Gt Cornard, Sudbury and Surrounding Area United Kingdom Selling Page have now seen his royal themed post about checking for cancer symptoms.

 

[Seaford Haggington]

Having two accounts like that is against Facebook terms of service. If he is reported enough he will be banned from Facebook.

 

[lilykestrel]

omg just noticed this when I went to search for it

was it originally going to be even more of a rip-off of Essex is United and they forgot to change the strapline?

---
don't get excited about the 1 review, by the way. It's from a bot shilling crypto.

 

[Pkershaw]

omg just noticed this when I went to search for it

View attachment 2739939

was it originally going to be even more of a rip-off of Essex is United and they forgot to change the strapline?

View attachment 2739953
---
don't get excited about the 1 review, by the way. It's from a bot shilling crypto.

Good grief, he’s such a clueless amateur. He markets himself as this social media guru, but the truth is, he is absolutely tit at it. He’s found one gullible mug in the shape of O’Callaghan and the pair of them have this God complex with nothing whatsoever to back it up. They’re charging Ferrari money and delivering a clapped out Ford Fiesta with no MOT.

£130k for some unwashed halfwit to sit in his shed reposting pointless shite into a load of other peoples groups all day in exchange for 3 or 4 Facebook likes. It truly beggars belief.

 

[Droosie123]

LG is all over this at the moment and especially in relation to Kirsty, who agreed funding for the Better Divorce Course but again it seems had a personal connection to the owner. Now the Better Divorce Course seems pretty good, I’ve referred a couple of people to it and heard positive feedback. That’s not the issue, the issue is Kirsty agreed the funding for it and then went on holiday with the owner. Plus received another gift from her.
How many other groups who could also offer a Better Divorce Course went after that funding and were declined because Kirsty favoured her friend?

 

[ochebalboa]

I'm surprised his monster ego hasn't got him back on to twitter.

 

[anniemouse]

I'm surprised his monster ego hasn't got him back on to twitter.

Let’s face it, he must have a sock account on there too, there’s no way he’d stay away. Wonder if there’s anyone new pestering Martin, Carol and bwagging about watioing the baddies.

 

[lilykestrel]

Tbf I think the Bribery Act training I did only said "best not to accept gifts from suppliers, but if you do accept a (tacky) (*) gift from your supplier, make sure to put it on your organisation's gift register" and didn't say anything about how it's probably not a good idea to POST ABOUT IT ON bleeping FACEBOOK. Shine a light, amateur hour.

(*) miaow, sorry not sorry

 

[lilykestrel]

it's always good when you have to explain to your audience why they should share your posts on (because your sock account has been rumbled)

 

[Fred Santos]

A significant intervention



Simon, if there's stuff you're not yet saying, it would be in your very best interest to now say it, becuase things are closing in...

 

[CookieZippy]

Henry Anderson seems to have stopped sharing stuff on Facebook. What a remarkable coincidence that is.

 

[lilykestrel]

via Twitter, what a surprise this is

heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere's Jonny (Searle)

 

[Lazarus]

i've had reasons to look up Jonathan Searle MBE before and: Jonathan William Courtis SEARLE personal appointments - Find and update company information - GOV.UK (company-information.service.gov.uk)

i think he's dodgy af. he's trustee at Oxford and Cambridge Rowing Foundation too.

 

[Fred Santos]

This lot need to be a bit braver with their follower acquisition strategy

 

[lilykestrel]

Just found this

Can Do Health & Care - Thinking Differently Report December 2020

This interactive publication is created with FlippingBook, a service for streaming PDFs online. No download, no waiting. Open and start reading right away!

sneeics.org.uk

Confused by this estimate of cost, unless I'm reading it wrong.

Because between March and October 2020 (this article was published in December 2020), Simon alone had been paid 47.5k (not counting the 15k, because that doesn't specify COVID). Maybe 'coronavirus campaign' doesn't count as ECVA, but in the spreadsheet ECC released, they counted it in the ECVA spend.

Also, 'we are planning to create a Digital Community Centre of Excellence in Essex' to scale this work nationally How did that turn out ....